Domestic Terrorist attack in Norway, Anders Behring Breivik apprehended (Rush Limbaugh, multiculturalism, salaries)

[Embla]

77 innocent people are dead, most of them teenagers. Several hundreds survived, but have been through events that are hard to comprehend. If I was a Christian I would spend my time praying.

[Calvinist]

Originally Posted by Randomstudent

I am sorry the gunman did not write a 1500 page manifesto on the New York times. Additionally that manifesto has a giant templar cross on the cover and makes numerous references to crusading.

Surely you're aware he called himself an atheist, right?

[Katarina Witt]

Originally Posted by janelle144

You never read the column posted did you? You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink.

I read it.

I see you don't have a link to a NYT headline referring to the gunman as a "Christian".

[roysoldboy]

Originally Posted by Deezus

Interesting that Ann Coulter and Bill O'Reilly(and a bunch of CityData posters) seem to be more outraged that some news reports called Breivik "a Christian" than by the fact that he commited two acts of terrorism that killed more than 80 people. Not even to bring up Glen Beck, who just seemed outraged that Norwegian youths shot were allowed to meet and discuss politics at a summer camp in the first place.

And yes I know the inevitable response--the Fort Hood shooter wasn't called Muslim enough times by the media. But it's just interesing how many pundits(and wannabe pundits) are just focusing their anger on the nature of the media coverage or even the victims(or even Muslims) rather than the fact that this sick lunatic committed an act of mass murder against innocent people.

It sounds to me like you failed to read the link. Maybe you should in order to know what the story was according to the author. Many more are like you and trying to argue against her without knowing what she said.

[roysoldboy]

Originally Posted by nr5667

Ann Coulter?

Some people haven't tired of her yet?

Some people read links and then attack the messenger but it seems that some really are stuck on the practices taught by the old teacher of community organizers.

[roysoldboy]

Originally Posted by bc42gb43

I thought that people grew tired of her shtick after she said that Christians are "perfected Jews," or her advocacy of banning women from voting.

I would have thought you would like those two stories and use them for your own good. Keep up the attack of the messenger as I told you to do in the OP.

[roysoldboy]

Originally Posted by liebknecht

Man, thank god for Ann Coulter, she has it figured all out. What would we be without her amazing political insight

How much of that link did you read? I'll bet old Saul would really be proud of you method of attacking the messenger without knowing word one of the message. Whoops, I forgot I did quote a bit of the message in the OP.

[roysoldboy]

Originally Posted by Konraden

I imagine better off.

Another Alinskyite speaks his mind.

[roysoldboy]

Originally Posted by Bulldogdad

Some of you people are either functionally illiterate or didn't even read the linked article before posting. Its all about The Hypocrisy of the New York Times and its liberal mindset/agenda.

I knew most of those who are showing their lack of knowledge about the article would use the old Alinsky method of attacking the messenger without even knowing the message would let fly on this one. Of course, they haven't seen the article and have no idea what it is about other than the little bit I posted from it.

[roysoldboy]

Originally Posted by bc42gb43

Coming from somebody who said "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building," I doubt there's any objective analysis in Ms. Coulter's latest screed here. She is an abhorrent troll who feasts on divisiveness, and her rants do not deserve serious analysis.

So you have to analyze everything you read? That tells me more than anything you have said lately.