Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-27-2011, 08:34 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
9,394 posts, read 15,694,356 times
Reputation: 6262

Advertisements

I know that in certain socialized health systems, the government basically dictates the cost of certain procedures and medications and whatnot. They can do it because they have greater bargaining power, that is, the healthcare of their entire country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-27-2011, 08:57 AM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,847,766 times
Reputation: 20030
nice link.

Quote:
Originally Posted by subsound View Post
Some one always pays for it, that is one of the most idiotic statements I have seen.

You pay out premiums on private insurance, and when you need a scan they pay the hospital...you pay taxes for it, and when you need it they pay the hospital.
this is part of the issue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Your knowledge of the situation is incredibly superficial.

Have you even been to Belgium? It's like 10 Million people. Does 10 Million equal 308 Million? Nope. You might want to educate yourself on a concept called "Economies of Scale."

Just because you can provide cost-effective efficient quality health care for 10 Million people, it does not logically follow that you can provide cost-effective efficient quality health care for 308 Million people.

That's even harder to do with societal attitudes. Europeans go to the doctor to get well, while Americans go to the doctor to feel good.

"Getting well" and "Feeling Good" are not the same thing, and "Feeling Good" costs a helluva lot of money, especially since it is highly subjective and not quantifiable.

You are also either totally ignorant of, or have completely ignored the fact that the European health care model and the US (and British) health care model is not the same thing.

The US (and British) health care model is centered on the hospital. A hospital is the least efficient means of health care delivery.

The Euro-model is centered on specialty clinics.

Huge difference.

I live in a Metropolitan Statistical Area that has 3 Million people in 11 counties in 2 States and one Commonwealth (Kentucky). We have 19 full-service hospitals (23 if you count the ones in Kentucky and Dearborn County Indiana).

Find a European city with 3 Million people that has more than 12 hospitals.

You can't do it. Paris with 3 Million people has 6 hospitals and both Bucharesti and Berlin have 3 Million people have 3 hospitals.

Why? Because they use the Clinic Model.

You cannot use the Clinic Model because Obama's best friend, the American Hospital Association wrote most of the crap in Obamacare and who outlawed doctor-owned anything force the grotesquely inefficient Hospital Model on you.

And even that wouldn't be so bad except the Hospitals are organized as Cartels and they collude and fix prices, which is illegal. And that is a proven fact.

Child-birth around here really only costs $2,300 but the Hospital Cartel charges $9,200 because they collude and fix prices (illegal).

As the Cincinnati Enquirer reported, open-heart surgery really only costs $13,000 but you pay $26,000 to $41,000 because the Hospital Cartel colludes and fixes prices (illegal).

Normally, when you have a business and you have a division that is losing money you either shut it down, spin it off or sell it. Let's say you own the High End Rear End Company and you manufacture hand-crafted pewter butt plugs.

You have the production division, the warehouse division and the distribution division (trucking/cartage). And let's say your distribution division is losing money hand over fist. You have three options: Sell the distribution division to someone else who can operate it at a profit, spin off your distribution into a separate company and see if that can benefit from that, or shut down the distribution and contract owner-operators independently to deliver your products.

Why don't you just raise your prices to cover the losses of your distribution division? You can't because there's an animal called Price Elasticity.

If you raise the price of your beautifully hand-crafted pewter butt plugs, then people will either do without or seek substitutes like butt plugs made of plastic, rubber, ceramic, Styrofoam, brass, depleted uranium, paper mâché or wood.

In the world of the Hospital Cartel, they have "divisions" too. They have
Allergy and Immunology, Anesthesiology, Dermatology, Emergency Medicine, Trauma Center, Internal Medicine, Cardiology, Endocrinology, Gastroenterology, Geriatric, Oncology, Hematology, Nephrology, Pulmonary, Rheumatology, Neurology, Neurosurgery, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Ophthalmology, Orthopaedics, Otolaryngology, Pediatrics, Psychiatry, Psychology, Neuro-Psychology, Radiology, Surgery, Sleep Hygiene/Clinic, Vascular, Diet & Weight Loss, Nutrition and Urology (to name a few).

Now, let's say the Diet & Weight Loss Clinic at Jewish Hospital is losing money faster than the US government can spend it. What does the Hospital do? Do the shut it down, sell it or spin it off?

Nope. They just raise the prices and fees for all other services to cover the fact that the Diet & Weight Loss Clinic is a sink-hole.

What about Price Elasticity? Not really valid here. Health care is like water. No matter what the price of water is, you will pay for it because there are few if any substitutes for water.

If you want water to bathe, cook, clean, wash your car, to drink or for other purposes, you're going to pay whatever it costs. Health care is the same way.

So if you want to see health care costs drop 350% to 700% in less than 24 hours, here's all you have to do:

1) Adopt the Sports/Radio Rule: One hospital, and only one hospital per MSA. That means the Sisters of Mercy who own all of the St Francis, St George, Mercy and Bethesda hospitals will have to sell off some of their hospitals, and so will the Sister of Charity who operate Good Samaritans and St Elizabeth hospitals in every major US city, and so will the others.

2) Shut down the Hospital Cartels and start prosecuting for price-fixing and collusion. I would say complain to the FTC, but the AHA owns Obama so the FTC isn't going to do squat, and if push comes to shove, Obama will just stick an AHA member as head of the FTC and that will be the end of that. Or maybe he'll put someone from Monsanto or Cargil there (like we don't have enough already).

3) Repeal that part of Obamacare that bans doctor-owned anything. That is prima facie evidence of price-fixing and collusion, because the AHA blocked competition. From the point of view of the AHA, why should you pay $13,000 for open-heart surgery when you can pay $26,000 to $41,000?

Why do you think kidney dialysis at a clinic is cheaper than that at a hospital? Why do you think the AHA has been trying to outlaw kidney dialysis clinics for the last 10 years? They want you pay through the nose (and kidney) instead of paying Free Market fees and rates.

Do that, and if there are still problems with the costs, and I'm sure there will be because some have this bizarre idea that it should be for free, then start eyeballing the "health insurance" companies. I don't believe the world will end if "health insurance" companies have profits capped at 20% or they are banned.
well said, but even you dont go in to the full depth of the problem, and that is government. the various governments around the country have mandates on what insurance companies are required to pay for, and what doctors and hospitals can charge medicare and medicaid, and VA, and other government run health care systems can charge the government for services, medications, and devices.

on top of that doctors have to practice defensive medicine, and they still get sued frivolously, which drives up their malpractice insurance premiums, which increases their costs, which means they have to charge more. hospitals also get sued frivolously, and thus their insurance premiums go up.

and then there is all the required government paperwork that everyone has to fill out, which means large amounts of administrative staffing which costs money, and that includes the insurance companies as well.

trying to compare the costs of the european health care model and the US model based on what certain procedures cost is a disingenuous comparison without including everything involved in the behind the scenes costs. for instance how many european doctors have to face frivolous lawsuits? how many euro doctors call for unnecessary tests to keep from being sued? the same goes with hospitals. how many european lawyers are getting rich from suing the health care industry for every little thing because their patients are not willing to communicate with their doctor about what side effects their medication is causing?

the cost of health care is high in this country, but it has been driven there by the government, and by people who think that a doctor should cure them without any problems in a couple of days.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
I believe the $3500 difference is profit being extracted by the private owners of the American health care system. Eliminate private ownership of hospitals and health insurance companies and the prices would drop accordingly.
wrong, as you have NO clue to the hidden costs of health care in this country, and you refuse to open your eyes to such costs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 09:01 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,873,039 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by HurricaneDC View Post
I know that in certain socialized health systems, the government basically dictates the cost of certain procedures and medications and whatnot. They can do it because they have greater bargaining power, that is, the healthcare of their entire country.
Why have ANY cost at all in such a system?


In fact,as the point of such systems is to promote better health,people should be paid to have tests and scans performed....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 09:03 AM
 
1,410 posts, read 2,139,829 times
Reputation: 1171
I've never heard of a PET scan; only a CAT scan...but seeing how cats are also pets...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,822,592 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
thank the government for that cost...
the government is the problem
I take it that you believe there is no government in Belgium.

Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
Why have ANY cost at all in such a system?
Because nothing is free. That includes sanity (which appears to be quite rare around here).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 01:01 PM
 
Location: in my imagination
13,608 posts, read 21,396,904 times
Reputation: 10111
QUOTE]

yet SOMEONE is paying for it

oh,, yep...they taxpayer gets screwed again[/quote]


And you aren't getting screwed when your insurance company along with all of them increase your premium, increase your deductible and decrease your coverage? Which has been happening to people for years, decades.

I can see the flipside benefits to their model. They will never have to worry about not being able to afford treatment, they will never have to worry about insurance denying them treatment or dictating to the doctors what the doctors can do. They will never have to worry about becoming bankrupt from medical bills or having a lifetime of bill collectors hounding them for a amount they could never pay.

They will never have to worry that only the rich will get treatment, because the super rich will never have to worry about a medical bill they can't pay or getting less treatment because they can't pay it. In their model respect for life is not based on how rich someone is.

Doctor~ Mr workingclasshero your daughter has a serious condition
WCH~ can she be treated?
Doctor~ yes treatment is available, with great success rates, but treatment will be on going for a long time
WCH~ how much?
Doctor~ typically around $75,000 a year
WCH~ I make 40k a year, I can't afford that
Doctor~ don't worry insurance will pay for it
WCH~ after I lost my last job I can't get insurance again for my daughter, they say she is too risky
Doctor~ well I guess your daughter is s*** out of luck
WCH~ is there government help?
MONKEYWRENCHING~ government help?, you blood sucker, you want to tax me? for something that should be your responsibilty? life is tough life is hard, but don't take FROM ME!

a few months later (hopefully not)
Doctor~Mr monkeywrench your son has a serious condition...........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 01:06 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
=lionking;20202282
yet SOMEONE is paying for it

oh,, yep...they taxpayer gets screwed again

And you aren't getting screwed when your insurance company along with all of them increase your premium, increase your deductible and decrease your coverage? Which has been happening to people for years, decades.

I can see the flipside benefits to their model. They will never have to worry about not being able to afford treatment, they will never have to worry about insurance denying them treatment or dictating to the doctors what the doctors can do. They will never have to worry about becoming bankrupt from medical bills or having a lifetime of bill collectors hounding them for a amount they could never pay.

They will never have to worry that only the rich will get treatment, because the super rich will never have to worry about a medical bill they can't pay or getting less treatment because they can't pay it. In their model respect for life is not based on how rich someone is.

Doctor~ Mr workingclasshero your daughter has a serious condition
WCH~ can she be treated?
Doctor~ yes treatment is available, with great success rates, but treatment will be on going for a long time
WCH~ how much?
Doctor~ typically around $75,000 a year
WCH~ I make 40k a year, I can't afford that
Doctor~ don't worry insurance will pay for it
WCH~ after I lost my last job I can't get insurance again for my daughter, they say she is too risky
Doctor~ well I guess your daughter is s*** out of luck
WCH~ is there government help?
MONKEYWRENCHING~ government help?, you blood sucker, you want to tax me? for something that should be your responsibilty? life is tough life is hard, but don't take FROM ME!
I want ALL insurance (private and governmental ) ABOLISHED


I believe in PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY

its you health, its your body, its your bill...pay the gosh darn bill


actual costs would be 1/4 if there was no insurance


you do understand that insurance is a SCAM (private or governmental)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 01:14 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,737,789 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
actual costs would be 1/4 if there was no insurance
source?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 01:21 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
source?
logic

if doctors/hospitals give a BILL of 10k.. but accept 3k from insurance or 2k from medicaid..then the ACTUAL cost must be AROUND there....

as to a source...no politicial/ paid whatever is going to ACTUALLY site that anywhere...they would be out of a job

but just look at the OP the pet scan is 25% (1/4) the cost

politicians work to fearmonger and pander...they WANT you to be on insurance (a scam) either private of better yet a liberal controlled governmental system




here is a senario for you

you are healthy you go to the doctor ONCE A YAER for an annual check up...costing about $100.....why would you pay 300 a month for insurance???? if you only go once a year... but the liberals want you to have a costly singlepayer or to mandate that you have insurance....the THIEVES of washington dc at work
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 01:32 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,737,789 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
logic
aw, too bad.

No source, no credibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:40 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top