Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-15-2011, 11:56 AM
 
Location: Texas
5,872 posts, read 8,090,819 times
Reputation: 2971

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
How many times now have you posted this stupid statement about seceding? It was meant tongue in cheek, only is being brought up by the true Perry haters and he never entertained the idea. Go back and read what he said...

Redshadow, he didn't talk about seceding: he simply said, when Texas joined the union they kept the right to sucede if they wanted and they still could. He wasn't seriously thinking of doing it. Only someone who has an axe to grind would even bring this up.

Nita

And that's the problem w/ Mr. Good hair. Texas DID NOT keep the right to secede when it joined the Republic, NOR when it re-joined after the civil war. TEXAS NEVER HAD THE RIGHT OR OPTION TO SECEDE. That's a complete bold faced lie, that Perry and anyone else who repeats it, is telling.

Texas in fact initially joined the Union mainly because Texas was broke and had huge debts that would be taken on by the United States, in exchange for it's territory that now constitutes Oklahoma, Colorado, Kansas and Wyoming in addition to REPAYING the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT the monies that were paid on it's behalf. A fact that Texas never did.

Mr. Perry should really be careful when attempting to bring up Texas history. There are actually some of us who know what the truth and it's history really are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-15-2011, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,728,778 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redshadowz View Post
As for Rick Perry. He talked about secession, and now he is running for president. Do you find that to be odd? I don't. As long as he is wanting to return this nation into the constitutional republic that it began, I am all for it. But more likely than not, he will continue the warmongering social conservative agenda, and will probably have very little respect for the states' rights that he championed during his talks of secession.

Are you referring to this?

"There's a lot of different scenarios," Perry said. "We've got a great union. There's absolutely no reason to dissolve it. But if Washington continues to thumb their nose at the American people, you know, who knows what might come out of that. But Texas is a very unique place, and we're a pretty independent lot to boot."

That was much ado about nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2011, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,728,778 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by txgolfer130 View Post
And that's the problem w/ Mr. Good hair. Texas DID NOT keep the right to secede when it joined the Republic, NOR when it re-joined after the civil war. TEXAS NEVER HAD THE RIGHT OR OPTION TO SECEDE. That's a complete bold faced lie, that Perry and anyone else who repeats it, is telling.
.

I can't find any place where Perry said Texas could secede. Do you have a direct quote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2011, 12:53 PM
 
Location: Texas
5,872 posts, read 8,090,819 times
Reputation: 2971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
I can't find any place where Perry said Texas could secede. Do you have a direct quote.

Read the quote and to whom I was responding to. Never mind I know that's asking to much:
Quote:
Redshadow, he didn't talk about seceding: he simply said, when Texas joined the union they kept the right to sucede if they wanted and they still could. He wasn't seriously thinking of doing it. Only someone who has an axe to grind would even bring this up.

Nita
But I've got something better than a direct quote. I've got Mr. Good-hair scumbag on video saying it:

Quote:
"Texas is a unique place. When we came into the union in 1845, one of the issues was that we would be able to leave if we decided to do that," Perry said.
HotAirPundit: Rick Perry Talks With Reporters On Succession At Austin Tea Party

And oh yeah...it's from a right wing favorite site, so no blaming or flame throwing about bias.

Seek and you shall find.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2011, 01:13 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
8,145 posts, read 6,528,866 times
Reputation: 1754
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Oh my...you mean those GOP governors are actually righting the mess made when the dems were in control?

RealClearPolitics - President Obama vs. Republican Candidates

Spin this. Even a fox news poll has Obama beating all your heroes.

Sorry tea party hate can only get you so far.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2011, 02:00 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,728,778 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by txgolfer130 View Post
Read the quote and to whom I was responding to. Never mind I know that's asking to much:


But I've got something better than a direct quote. I've got Mr. Good-hair scumbag on video saying it:



HotAirPundit: Rick Perry Talks With Reporters On Succession At Austin Tea Party

And oh yeah...it's from a right wing favorite site, so no blaming or flame throwing about bias.

Seek and you shall find.

Wow !!!! Are we having a bad day? And using those grade school names ??? Makes you feel like a real adult?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2011, 02:26 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,728,778 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmw335xi View Post
Texas #1 in highest percentage of people earning MINIMUM WAGE with an 8.2% UNEMPLOYMENT RATE. Nice statistics to brag about! A $27 billion short-fall, paid by 50,000 teachers and drastic cuts in healthcare, so his oil buddies can keep their record profits.

Got any facts to back up your opinions?

And last time I checked 8.2% was a lot less than the National rate......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2011, 02:42 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,728,778 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redshadowz View Post
I really get tired of seeing statistics like this. They look at states as if they are all exactly the same time.

I mean, take California as an example. According to the numbers, California has created 10% of the jobs in 2011. Wyoming has only created .5% of the jobs in 2011. But if you compare by population, California's 86,650 jobs created is only a .23% job creation rate vs its population. Wyoming's 4,050 jobs represents a .75% job creation rate vs its population.

In that sense, Wyoming is doing three times better at creating jobs than California. If you actually look at Texas in 2011, its 114,750 jobs created is only a .46% job creation rate vs its population, which is crap compared even to its neighbor to the north Oklahoma. Whose 26,700 jobs created is about a .73% increase in jobs in the state this year alone. For 2011, Massachusetts actually has a higher job growth rate than Texas, with a .537% increase. And if you look at North Dakota, its job increases are a full 1.26% increase, which is almost three times the rate of Texes year.

Even if you pull the numbers for both 2010 and 2011. Texas added about 1.42% jobs relative to its population. North Dakota is up 3.7% jobs relative to their population since 2010.
I think the chart on the web site is quite clear and not misleading at all. It says Texas had 8.27% of the workforce beginning in 2010 but added 19% of the new jobs.

Let's check your math using population rather than workforce as you suggest.

Texas added 350,650 jobs in 2010 and 2011 with a population of 24,304,000. That's 14.47 jobs per thousand residents.

OK added 41200 jobs in 2010 and 2011 with a population of 3,644,000. That's 11.31 jobs per thousand residents.

CA added 181,750 jobs in 2010 and 2011 with a population of 36,580,000. That's 4.97 jobs per thousand residents.

So what's your beef?

There is NOTHING misleading about that web site.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2011, 02:50 PM
 
Location: Texas
5,872 posts, read 8,090,819 times
Reputation: 2971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
Wow !!!! Are we having a bad day? And using those grade school names ??? Makes you feel like a real adult?

Aww, are we a little sensitive today? Did no one give you a hug? Do you need a participation ribbon?

Grade school names? Not one there...however there are some apt descriptors that apply so appropriately.

And I don't need words to make me feel like a real adult. Do you? Should I call a emotional trauma specialist?

Oh, and nice attempt at a dodge of Mr. Good hair actually talking about secession.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2011, 02:59 PM
 
Location: Eastern NC
20,868 posts, read 23,537,374 times
Reputation: 18814
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
Got any facts to back up your opinions?

And last time I checked 8.2% was a lot less than the National rate......
So you are saying that 8.2% is something to applaud.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top