Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-22-2011, 12:55 PM
 
Location: Imaginary Figment
11,449 posts, read 14,468,431 times
Reputation: 4777

Advertisements

A republican who addresses man made Global warming and advocates cap n' trade. Much like Obama's health care overhaul, we see a resurgence of something once advocated by the Republicans in today's legislation. Of course most of their zealots are completely unaware of this, only in tune with the latest GOP talking points du jour and totally out of touch with the history of their own party.

They'll deny it, but this clearly shows their disingenuous "beliefs" when protesting anything Obama may put forth. They're not opposed to the principle, only the man. In fact they have no principles what-so-ever, only marching orders from right wing blogs and various media outlets, which they follow with glee and without thought. Totally oblivious to their hypocrisy and even when it's pointed out they brush it off, because it would require them to self examine their core beliefs and principles. Worse yet it would require them to examine their own party who spoon feeds them this inane doubletalk.

Lets take a look shall we. Here Bush advocates cap n' trade as a means to address both pollution and climate change caused by man. He touts the success of cap n' trade from the 90's as well:

Quote:
The clean skies legislation will reach our ambitious air quality goals through a market-based cap-and-trade approach that rewards innovation, reduces cost and guarantees results. Instead of the government telling utilities where and how to cut pollution, we will tell them when and how much to cut. We will give them a firm deadline and let them find the most innovative ways to meet it. You see, since 1995 we have used a cap-and-trade programmeme for sulphur dioxide pollution. It has cut more air pollution, this system has reduced more air pollution in the last decade than all other programmes combined.
Bush, remember the President all the Neo Cons claim "They Miss" and wish could come back, goes on to recommit to the UN's goal. Ultimately proposing 4.5 BILLION or "more than any other nation's commitment in the entire world."

Quote:
I reaffirm America's commitment to the United Nations Framework Convention and it's central goal, to stabilize atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations at a level that will prevent dangerous human interference with the climate.
There are no core beliefs in the Republican party today, only obstruction and hypocrisy of the highest order.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-22-2011, 12:56 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,455,215 times
Reputation: 4243
I guess you're getting tired of trying to defend Obama so you have to dig up old news eh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 12:57 PM
 
5,391 posts, read 7,231,338 times
Reputation: 2857
Did you forget? Nobody on C-D supported Bush or can remember anyone voting for him.

Except when it's his birthday, then someone will start a thread about it and people will post how they miss him.

The day after, the forum resumes to "Bush? Who was he?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 01:01 PM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,938,262 times
Reputation: 11790
I never forgot. And you conveniently forget that Bush decided to "believe" in global warming right at the end of his term. The only people who believe in global warming are globalists hellbent on uniting the world under the UN flag, and the progressives who think it's all about the environment when CO2 contributes NOTHING to global temperature since CO2 increases lag behind temperature increases.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 01:04 PM
 
Location: Imaginary Figment
11,449 posts, read 14,468,431 times
Reputation: 4777
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
I never forgot. And you conveniently forget that Bush decided to "believe" in global warming right at the end of his term.
Funny since the speech was given at the start of his term.

Try again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 01:04 PM
 
Location: Vermont
11,761 posts, read 14,656,809 times
Reputation: 18534
And scientists. Don't forget the scientists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 01:05 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,201,643 times
Reputation: 7693
Politicians from both parties embrace and espouse this garbage to:

A. Get votes
-or-
B. Pay off political markers

Pointing at Bush just shows the lunacy of the progressive left.........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Imaginary Figment
11,449 posts, read 14,468,431 times
Reputation: 4777
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
I guess you're getting tired of trying to defend Obama so you have to dig up old news eh?
This isn't old news, in fact it's quiet new and addresses current events. It has little to do with Bush and everything to do with the complete and utter hypocrisy on the right in regards to their "beliefs."

Quote:
Originally Posted by plwhit View Post

Pointing at Bush just shows the lunacy of the progressive left.........
Is it really a surprise that none of you seem to understand the point?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Imaginary Figment
11,449 posts, read 14,468,431 times
Reputation: 4777
So far nobody can address this, why is that? Instead I see insults, and deflection. C'mon now, lets talk. Why are the republicans always up in arms over legislation or ideals they were advocating only years prior?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 01:08 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,201,643 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLCPUNK View Post
This isn't old news, in fact it's quiet new and addresses current events. It has little to do with Bush and everything to do with the complete and utter hypocrisy on the right in regards to their "beliefs."
Is it really a surprise that none of you seem to understand the point?
I agree, it is quiet new, it's so quiet hardly anyone heard it.


Please tell us the point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:58 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top