08-23-2011, 09:57 AM
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read
21,887,851 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Winter_Sucks
Because Gaddafi is a terrorist and it will bring about a more secure region.
He is?
How does funding and supporting a civil war stabilise a region?
And using your reasons given,then Iraq was a good war too.
You must have supported it.
08-23-2011, 09:59 AM
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read
18,301,225 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by
oz in SC
He is?
How does funding and supporting a civil war stabilise a region?
And using your reasons given,then Iraq was a good war too.
You must have supported it.
No Iraq was not a good war because his hero didn't support it. Afghanistan is the righteous war because Obama supports it.
08-23-2011, 10:00 AM
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read
18,301,225 times
Reputation: 3826
LOL @ Gadaffi as "GOP's favorite dictator".
08-23-2011, 10:01 AM
13,900 posts, read
9,783,660 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by
oz in SC
He is?
How does funding and supporting a civil war stabilise a region?
And using your reasons given,then Iraq was a good war too.
You must have supported it.
If Iraq would have started like Libya did, I would support that, but it didn't. We also have spent $1 trillion on Iraq and only $1 billion on Libya.
Terrible comparison on your part.
08-23-2011, 10:01 AM
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read
18,301,225 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Winter_Sucks
Terrible comparison on your part.
Agreed. Iraq was from Bush and Libya was from Obama. There's the difference.
08-23-2011, 10:03 AM
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read
21,887,851 times
Reputation: 2519
Just think,soon more nations can become part of the empire...
Military Maps | Mother Jones
08-23-2011, 10:03 AM
13,900 posts, read
9,783,660 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by
summers73
Agreed. Iraq was from Bush and Libya was from Obama. There's the difference.
Libyans started their war against their dictator. Bush started the war against Saddam. There's the difference.
08-23-2011, 10:04 AM
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read
21,887,851 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Winter_Sucks
If Iraq would have started like Libya did, I would support that, but it didn't. We also have spent $1 trillion on Iraq and only $1 billion on Libya.
Terrible comparison on your part.
You seem ignorant of your own nations recent history.
There was armed resistance in Iraq,both in the south and in the north.
08-23-2011, 10:04 AM
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read
18,301,225 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Winter_Sucks
Libyans started their war against their dictator. Bush started the war against Saddam. There's the difference.
Got Kurds?
08-23-2011, 10:05 AM
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read
21,887,851 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Winter_Sucks
Libyans started their war against their dictator. Bush started the war against Saddam. There's the difference.
Ignorance of your nation's recent history again...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com .