Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-24-2011, 11:26 PM
 
6,940 posts, read 9,681,455 times
Reputation: 3153

Advertisements

He knew of this and warned that the housing bubble was unprecedented.


Paul Krugman on the housing bubble - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-24-2011, 11:48 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,870,209 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
He knew of this and warned that the housing bubble was unprecedented.


Paul Krugman on the housing bubble - YouTube
says Paul Krugman was one of the few economists who predicted a housing bubble and correction to prices back in 2006. Ron Paul beat him by 4 years. Austrian economics.

Ron Paul July 2002 introduced the Free Market Enhancement Act

" Ironically, by transferring the risk of a widespread mortgage default, the government increases the likelihood of a painful crash in the housing market. This is because the special privileges of Fannie, Freddie, and HLBB have distorted the housing market by allowing them to attract capital they could not attract under pure market conditions.

When housing prices fall, homeowners will experience difficulty as their equity is wiped out. Furthermore, the holders of the mortgage debt will also have a loss."


Ron Paul on the Housing Bubble – July 2002
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2011, 12:02 AM
 
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,893 posts, read 18,447,268 times
Reputation: 6465
That was not hard for any one to predict. Fannie and Freddie were not buyer's friends as some thought. Those in the loan industry who approved loans to those who never should of received them some with questionable credit historys. I know i was in real eastate for 15 years, i saw it all. Some couples like getting in over their heads, some had terrible credit, but still these loans went thru. Why. Those who approved the loans know what they were doing. Those who should not buy something more then they can afford, had no business looking at homes, that were way more then they could afford, i saw this happen time and time again.
Fannie and Freedie, Bad Loans and people buying over their heads, have not helped this situation.
Now we are at a time when most people's home value have fallen so low, some will have to go into foreclosure, for some they owe so much more then their home value is worth. I know a couple who recently walked away from their mortgage, their home value was lower then what they owe on their home, it was beautiful, in a nice area, upgrades galore, and they just walked away. Cannot afford a home, look for a less expensive one, any home can be made to be beautiful by upgrading it if you can afford to do so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2011, 12:04 AM
 
45,230 posts, read 26,450,499 times
Reputation: 24987
Too bad he hasn't figured out the cause yet.

Ron Paul could school this party hack on the economy in a New York minute
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2011, 05:39 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,285,820 times
Reputation: 3826
Krugman doing what he does best, BS'ing people.

Krugman In '02: 'Greenspan Needs To Create A Housing Bubble'

Quote:
And to do that, as Paul McCulley of Pimco put it, Alan Greenspan needs to create a housing bubble to replace the Nasdaq bubble.
What's the point in predicting something when you're a shill for it in the first place?

Krugman = Economics FAIL

(In before "Nobel Prize" and "Princeton professor" qualifications)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2011, 06:25 AM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,564,185 times
Reputation: 29289
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
Krugman doing what he does best, BS'ing people.

Krugman In '02: 'Greenspan Needs To Create A Housing Bubble'



What's the point in predicting something when you're a shill for it in the first place?

Krugman = Economics FAIL

(In before "Nobel Prize" and "Princeton professor" qualifications)
Lol... The kruggster advocated for a housing bubble?!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2011, 06:32 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,791,864 times
Reputation: 24863
The point of the whole deal was to make certain everyone had a mortgage not necessarily an affordable house.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2011, 06:39 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,285,820 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
Lol... The kruggster advocated for a housing bubble?!
Does it surprise you, what with his talk of space alien stimulus packages?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2011, 06:49 AM
 
6,940 posts, read 9,681,455 times
Reputation: 3153
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
Krugman doing what he does best, BS'ing people.

Krugman In '02: 'Greenspan Needs To Create A Housing Bubble'



What's the point in predicting something when you're a shill for it in the first place?

Krugman = Economics FAIL

(In before "Nobel Prize" and "Princeton professor" qualifications)
It was taken out of context.


Me And The Bubble - NYTimes.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2011, 06:50 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
He knew of this and warned that the housing bubble was unprecedented.
uhm was warned about in 2000

Housing in the New Millennium: A Home Without Equity is Just a Rental with Debt

Joshua Rosner
Graham Fisher & Co.


June 29, 2000



Abstract:
This report assesses the prospects of the U.S. housing/mortgage sector over the next several years. Based on our analysis, we believe there are elements in place for the housing sector to continue to experience growth well above GDP. However, we believe there are risks that can materially distort the growth prospects of the sector. Specifically, it appears that a large portion of the housing sector's growth in the 1990's came from the easing of the credit underwriting process. Such easing includes:

* The drastic reduction of minimum down payment levels from 20% to 0%
* A focused effort to target the "low income" borrower
* The reduction in private mortgage insurance requirements on high loan to value mortgages
* The increasing use of software to streamline the origination process and modify/recast delinquent loans in order to keep them classified as "current"
* Changes in the appraisal process which has led to widespread overappraisal/over-valuation problems

If these trends remain in place, it is likely that the home purchase boom of the past decade will continue unabated. Despite the increasingly more difficult economic environment, it may be possible for lenders to further ease credit standards and more fully exploit less penetrated markets. Recently targeted populations that have historically been denied homeownership opportunities have offered the mortgage industry novel hurdles to overcome. Industry participants in combination with eased regulatory standards and the support of the GSEs (Government Sponsored Enterprises) have overcome many of them.

If there is an economic disruption that causes a marked rise in unemployment, the negative impact on the housing market could be quite large. These impacts come in several forms. They include a reduction in the demand for homeownership, a decline in real estate prices and increased foreclosure expenses.

These impacts would be exacerbated by the increasing debt burden of the U.S. consumer and the reduction of home equity available in the home. Although we have yet to see any materially negative consequences of the relaxation of credit standards, we believe the risk of credit relaxation and leverage can't be ignored. Importantly, a relatively new method of loan forgiveness can temporarily alter the perception of credit health in the housing sector. In an effort to keep homeowners in the home and reduce foreclosure expenses, holders of mortgage assets are currently recasting or modifying troubled loans. Such policy initiatives may for a time distort the relevancy of delinquency and foreclosure statistics. However, a protracted housing slowdown could eventually cause modifications to become uneconomic and, thus, credit quality statistics would likely become relevant once again. The virtuous circle of increasing homeownership due to greater leverage has the potential to become a vicious cycle of lower home prices due to an accelerating rate of foreclosures.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top