Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The first thing to understand is that Obama, and the men who control him, have absolutely no interest or desire to have the United States economy recover and flourish.
Liberals don't know what "fundamentally change" actually means, because their perception of America is that it has never been exceptional to begin with. That's why they bought this POS's ruse.
I've always disliked Liberalism, but the 2008 election and all the sheep that stood in line to vote for this creep has forever (and I mean forever) changed my opinion of those who lean left. They simply cannot be trusted ever again.
Liberals don't know what "fundamentally change" actually means, because their perception of America is that it has never been exceptional to begin with. That's why they bought this POS's ruse.
I've always disliked Liberalism, but the 2008 election and all the sheep that stood in line to vote for this creep has forever (and I mean forever) changed my opinion of those who lean left. They simply cannot be trusted ever again.
Excellent post.
And I really don't mean this to be rude...
...but I cannot for the life of me understand why people could hear this and STILL vote for him. I don't think I will ever understand it. Was 60% of America, or whatever it was, in a coma? or a fog? or too blind?
Even people I consider intelligent, like my parents, fell for this guy, the proverbial hook, line, and sinker.
Remember three days before the election when Tom Brokaw, of all people, actually went on air and said "You know what? We don't know anything about this guy and what he actually has done or plans to do" (not an exact quote).
Where on earth do people get the idea Obama is intelligent?
He's an idiot!
For one thing, his slow-witted non-answers to even the most straightforward questions are seen by his supporters as "thoughtfulness". Clinton had good answers for even the toughest questions at his fingertips, so I guess that makes him a total imbecile...
A combination of ivory tower thinking and a relentless pursuit of ideology regardless of whether it makes sense or not. Not to mention really god-awful leadership skills.
For one thing, his slow-witted non-answers to even the most straightforward questions are seen by his supporters as "thoughtfulness". Clinton had good answers for even the toughest questions at his fingertips, so I guess that makes him a total imbecile...
What I've said all along is that he wasn't qualified to step into the White House. The time he spent in congress was too short for him to establish him self in Washington. Hillary should have went first then maybe Obama.
What I've said all along is that he wasn't qualified to step into the White House. The time he spent in congress was too short for him to establish him self in Washington. Hillary should have went first then maybe Obama.
So 2 or 3 more terms as back-bench senator would have somehow magically transformed him into a "leader"? He might have been the next Harry Reid, but that ain't sayin' much...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
