Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Taxing everyone earning $1 million would have what impact on the deficit?
$1.65 trillion (we might even have a surplus) 10 27.78%
$1.3 trillion 1 2.78%
$1 trillion 4 11.11%
$800 billion 0 0%
$500 billion 1 2.78%
Less than $200 billion or less than 12% of the deficit 20 55.56%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-19-2011, 05:53 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,744,889 times
Reputation: 9325

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCobb View Post
I agree with you, Roadking. You can't tax anyone, rich or otherwise, at that ridiculous rate. I seem to recall rich people running around before Bush though. I think we can safely go back to the pre Bush tax rates -- for everyone, not just the rich.

Or we could just cut government spending and not increase taxes for anybody.

Our government is so bloated and out of control that it could use a good 40% spending cut.

Problem is that the wimps in DC just pretend to cut... but they refuse to shrink government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-19-2011, 05:59 AM
 
35,309 posts, read 52,315,210 times
Reputation: 30999
I'm all for taxing the rich but lets be fair about it,if my middle-class payroll taxes are 25% then a millionaires taxable income should also be levied at 25%

Last edited by jambo101; 09-19-2011 at 06:28 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 06:38 AM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,670,668 times
Reputation: 20886
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicet4 View Post
Obama appears to be putting anyone earning $1 million or more against the wall next to the IRS building.

We we taxed everyone earning $1 million and more at a 80% tax rate what impact would this have on the national deficit?

It should be noted if taxed at 80% anyone filthy enough to earn over $1 million dollars would be left with close to nothing once state and local taxes were paid.

As for the nations current financial position consider the following:

US Tax Revenue: $2,170,000,000,000
Federal Budget: $3,820,000,000,000
New National Debt: $1,650,000,000,000
National Debt: $14,271,000,000,000

We need $1.650 trillion to balance the budget.

How much would an 80% income tax (no deductions either) raise?
I personally will just take more vacation and get below that level. There is no point in generating any additional revenue if it is taxed at 80%- better to stay at home or on vacation and enjoy myself.

Why in the world would ANYONE work for 20% of what they earn?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 07:10 AM
 
1,432 posts, read 1,092,091 times
Reputation: 333
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCobb View Post
I agree with you, Roadking. You can't tax anyone, rich or otherwise, at that ridiculous rate. I seem to recall rich people running around before Bush though. I think we can safely go back to the pre Bush tax rates -- for everyone, not just the rich.
I don't like incresing taxes, but at least you talk about raising it for all...which is much fairer to me than raising on one group. Also, there is not that much money in raising rates on high earners. I ve seen that from multiple of sources.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 07:11 AM
 
3,457 posts, read 3,623,920 times
Reputation: 1544
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicet4 View Post
We we taxed everyone earning $1 million and more at a 80% tax rate what impact would this have on the national deficit?
probably very little. the average adjusted gross income of the top 400 taxpayers was $270,510, so taxing people who earn over $1 million wouldn't give you very many people. Rich folks are reputed to do a great job of hiding their incomes from the IRS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 07:14 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,791,864 times
Reputation: 24863
Because they are "earning" many, many times what they are worth?

Again I propose a Income Tax levied on all income from all sources with the bottom 90% exempted from the tax. The rate should be set at as level that covers current government expenses plus eliminating the deficit in 10 years. This tax would be augmented with countervailing tariffs set to eliminate any profit created by low wages, lax environmental standards and foreign government subsidy.

These would put our government on a sound financial base as well as reinvigorating our industrial economy. The results would be a resumption of good times for most without imposing any real hardship on the moneyed class other than some emotional loss of status and privilege. That is a small price to pay for restoring the American Dream to reality for most.

Before you RWA’s begin calling me names, yes, I am way to the left of Liberal and all of the Democrats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 07:22 AM
 
1,432 posts, read 1,092,091 times
Reputation: 333
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
Because they are "earning" many, many times what they are worth?

Again I propose a Income Tax levied on all income from all sources with the bottom 90% exempted from the tax. The rate should be set at as level that covers current government expenses plus eliminating the deficit in 10 years. This tax would be augmented with countervailing tariffs set to eliminate any profit created by low wages, lax environmental standards and foreign government subsidy.

These would put our government on a sound financial base as well as reinvigorating our industrial economy. The results would be a resumption of good times for most without imposing any real hardship on the moneyed class other than some emotional loss of status and privilege. That is a small price to pay for restoring the American Dream to reality for most.

Before you RWA’s begin calling me names, yes, I am way to the left of Liberal and all of the Democrats.
Yes, we know. Guess you are an expert of what jobs are worth. Guess you get to figure the market rate for a neurosurgeon versus someone sweeping hall ways. Sure, they should be paid the same according to your ideas.
Too bad, most of us don't like the idea of moochers trying to sponge off high earners to make things an equal outcome....Easy for people who don't have to make decisions for people who have gotten ahead through hard work....
Still sounds like envy to me...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 07:22 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
Because they are "earning" many, many times what they are worth?

Again I propose a Income Tax levied on all income from all sources with the bottom 90% exempted from the tax. The rate should be set at as level that covers current government expenses plus eliminating the deficit in 10 years. This tax would be augmented with countervailing tariffs set to eliminate any profit created by low wages, lax environmental standards and foreign government subsidy.

These would put our government on a sound financial base as well as reinvigorating our industrial economy. The results would be a resumption of good times for most without imposing any real hardship on the moneyed class other than some emotional loss of status and privilege. That is a small price to pay for restoring the American Dream to reality for most.

Before you RWA’s begin calling me names, yes, I am way to the left of Liberal and all of the Democrats.
"all income from all sorces"....will never happen

a majority of income is never reported to begin with

from the LOWEST LEVEL to the HIGHEST LEVEL

you just cant tax income.....it has PROVEN that it doesnt work

tax spending...a consumption tax...... Americans For Fair Taxation: Americans For Fair Taxation ...... come on take a look,,, do some research.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 07:26 AM
 
1,432 posts, read 1,092,091 times
Reputation: 333
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
"all income from all sorces"....will never happen

a majority of income is never reported to begin with

from the LOWEST LEVEL to the HIGHEST LEVEL

you just cant tax income.....it has PROVEN that it doesnt work

tax spending...a consumption tax...... Americans For Fair Taxation: Americans For Fair Taxation ...... come on take a look,,, do some research.....
This is avery good concept. Makes alot of sense. Get rid of deductions and have 1 rate.

Someone making a million, taxed at 20% = 200K
Someone making 20K, taxed at 20% = 4K

Looks like the millionaire is paying their fair share, as well as the low earner. This actually would probably bring in more revenues. This also would finally get around that whiny argument, but this tax rate is "hard" for the low earner.
Geez, exhempt the first 25K if folks wanted to be charitable. How is this not fair?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 07:26 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,951,723 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffdano View Post
No it wouldn't. According to 2009 data on the IRS website, there were 236,883 tax returns with AGI > $1M, representing $727M of income. Multipling by 80% would result in $582M of tax revenue. Not additional tax revenue, total tax revenue, since that money is already taxed. That income generated $177M in taxes in 2009. So the OP's proposed rate, assuming he means total tax rate, will generate about $405M of additional tax revenue.
You got your numbers wrong and didn't cite where your figures are from.

You stated "there were 236,883 tax returns with AGI > $1M, representing $727M of income." That's obviously wrong because just the top 400 taxpayers reported $137.9 billion in income. That alone would yield $110 billion from just 400 taxpayers.

The error in your statement is you said "M" instead of "B." It was $727B of income, not $727M. So, taking your own math at face value, that would yield $405,000,000,000 in additional annual income, or enough money to roughly cut the deficit in half on its own.

Instead of proving that such a tax is minimal, it's actually quite a bit of money.

In any case, 80% is too high a rate but going back to Saint Reagan's rate of 50% is reasonable.

Last edited by MTAtech; 09-19-2011 at 07:36 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:10 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top