Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Considering how sleazy the Obamanites are, they'll do anything to force Thomas to leave the bench, which isn't going to happen unless Kagan leaves with him due to her own 'conflict of interest' issues.
Anyway you slice it, the Dems are bound to lose big time when ObamaCare goes up in flames.
Thank goodness for the rest of us who won't have our healthcare system and our wallets demolished by this piece of crap.
Considering how sleazy the Obamanites are, they'll do anything to force Thomas to leave the bench, which isn't going to happen unless Kagan leaves with him due to her own 'conflict of interest' issues.
Anyway you slice it, the Dems are bound to lose big time when ObamaCare goes up in flames.
Thank goodness for the rest of us who won't have our healthcare system and our wallets demolished by this piece of crap.
They can't force him to leave the bench, but I don't put them doing harm to him out of the question in an attempt to change this country to their totalitarian dreams.
I hope that they finally are successful at destroying this incompetent Justice. He is an insult to the seat once held by the great Thurgood Marshall.
What opinions has he written that would make him incompetent in your mind?
The justice who will be in danger of recusal for obamacare is Kagan, not Thomas, but we all know why the Left would like to see him recuse himself.
Quote:
A Supreme Court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg told the Huffington Post this week that justices are not required to disclose the amount earned by spouses--only the source of their spouses' income.
From the people who brought you personhood for corporations...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunnysee
Seriously? take a good man down and continue to raise up, what?
A fumbling Communist leader?!
A good man?
Anita Hill, current conflict of interest, lied on mandatory disclosure forms, etc.
Tell me, what has he done that makes him "good man" and, a better question, a "good justice"?
Your post makes no sense. What kind of communist leader will be on the bench? What ones are there now?
A good man?
Anita Hill, current conflict of interest, lied on mandatory disclosure forms, etc.
Tell me, what has he done that makes him "good man" and, a better question, a "good justice"?
Your post makes no sense. What kind of communist leader will be on the bench? What ones are there now?
That would require honesty.
Anita Hill? A totally manufactured "story" from the democrats.
There is no there there.
Maybe you missed this?
Quote:
A Supreme Court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg told the Huffington Post this week that justices are not required to disclose the amount earned by spouses--only the source of their spouses' income.
You bunch of ignorant, racist liberals need mental help, Clarence Thomas isn't going anywhere until he knows he'll be replaced by another conservative justice.
Location: The bustling, world-renowned downtown of Pataskala, OH
188 posts, read 197,958 times
Reputation: 129
I loved when Thomas moved up north for college, he compared racists in the south and the north to rattlesnakes and water moccasins, respectively. One will make a bunch of noise and let you know your not welcome, and if it bites, will hurt, but not kill. The other won't let you know and make a show about it, it will just bite you, and it's bite is lethal.
It is really astonishing how little the left knows.
CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin on Clarence Thomas: “Rarely Has A Supreme Court Justice Enjoyed Such Broad Vindication.” | The Kitchen Cabinet.US (http://thekitchencabinet.us/2011/09/03/cnns-jeffrey-toobin-on-clarence-thomas-rarely-has-a-supreme-court-justice-enjoyed-such-broad-vindication/ - broken link)
"The greatest revenge is success. Clarence Thomas may go down in judicial history as the most important voice on the Court in two decades. In Toobin’s New Yorker article, Steve Calabresi, a law professor at Northwestern and co-founder of the Federalist Society says, “(Thomas’ opinions) are very scholarly, with lots of historical sources, and his views are the most principled, even among the conservatives. He has staked out some bold positions, and then the Court has set out and moved in his direction.”"
considering that it's a conservative white womens' group, It's just a little biased.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
From the people who brought you personhood for corporations...
