Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I find it interesting that the right won't give Obama and credit in helping to bring down Gadaffi but have no problem blaming him if Sharia's law becomes law there.
I find that a puzzling statement. But, I also find it puzzling that it became acceptable to assasinate him after he opened Libya up to the UN and supposedly got rid of most of his really dangerous weapons. One does have to question if there is truth behind the so called "conspiracy theories" in regard to the world banks not wanting Africa to have its own gold standard currency. Additionally it is said that Libya sits upon much of the world's unmined gold reserves (not to mention the oil).
The same Marxist powers ready to unsettle the ME & N. Africa are watching the Occupy movement and ready to utilize it to their advantage. In this day and age coincidences are rare at best. Authoritarianism seems to be the religion flavor of the statists.
Share! Share! Share!
The mulit-banks and O'Bama are Sharey Baby thieves.
I find it interesting that the right won't give Obama and credit in helping to bring down Gadaffi but have no problem blaming him if Sharia's law becomes law there.
Credit for what? Death by impalement instead of a trial? Do you really expect civilized people to support such depravity?
Sharia was completely predictable in Libya just as it was in Egypt before it. Does the left condone repetition of the same mistakes by their dear student dictator? Or is Sharia and global caliphate the real end game?
I find it interesting that the right won't give Obama and credit in helping to bring down Gadaffi but have no problem blaming him if Sharia's law becomes law there.
He ought to learn to respect the rights of sovereign nations.
Credit for what? Death by impalement instead of a trial? Do you really expect civilized people to support such depravity?
Sharia was completely predictable in Libya just as it was in Egypt before it. Does the left condone repetition of the same mistakes by their dear student dictator? Or is Sharia and global caliphate the real end game?
I am sure you had no problem with the death of Saddam or the holding of our enemy combatants at gitmo do you?
I find it interesting that the right won't give Obama and credit in helping to bring down Gadaffi but have no problem blaming him if Sharia's law becomes law there.
It's weird, especially knowing Libya has had Sharia law for decades.
I am sure you had no problem with the death of Saddam or the holding of our enemy combatants at gitmo do you?
IIRC, Saddam had a trial did he not? If you are suggesting I was joyful at his death, I was not. I find the willingness of people to celebrate at the deaths of others sickening. Justice under the rule of law should be served but it makes us animals to revel in the death of another, IMO. YMMV.
The enemy combatants should have had their military trials years ago. Why hasn't Obama seen to it yet, too busy campaigning?
Credit for what? Death by impalement instead of a trial? Do you really expect civilized people to support such depravity?
Sharia was completely predictable in Libya just as it was in Egypt before it. Does the left condone repetition of the same mistakes by their dear student dictator? Or is Sharia and global caliphate the real end game?
Again, Libya has had Sharia for a very long time.
Did you prefer the public humiliation and hanging of Saddam better than Gadaffi's execution.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.