Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They source their statements and prove their point, so yes I do believe that they published it. That's what people in the real world do instead of raving in a paranoid fashion like you have done in the three other threads, demanding you were right until proven wrong (negative proof is the sign of a crank remember), that you then abandoned after you had several pages of mocking refutations.
They source their statements and prove their point, so yes I do believe that they published it. That's what people in the real world do instead of raving in a paranoid fashion like you have done in the three other threads, demanding you were right until proven wrong (negative proof is the sign of a crank remember), that you then abandoned after you had several pages of mocking refutations.
Beautiful attack of a messenger. You are going to score very well in the Alinsky school for radicals if you ever enroll.
Now that you have told me all that is good about Mother Jones maybe you could take some time to discuss the message in the link. Oh well, I guess that isn't very important to you.
Beautiful attack of a messenger. You are going to score very well in the Alinsky school for radicals if you ever enroll.
Now that you have told me all that is good about Mother Jones maybe you could take some time to discuss the message in the link. Oh well, I guess that isn't very important to you.
You asked if people believed they published it, and I did with a concise explanation why. It also is your forth thread raving about this, and you have started a new one each time you are refuted. I am certainly happy to link each one from your own public user page if you like.
If you want to discuss more you have to tell people what you want to discuss, or try and do an analysis of why it is wrong if you can, instead of hoping people read your mind and being disappointed when they don't.
You asked if people believed they published it, and I did with a concise explanation why. It also is your forth thread raving about this, and you have started a new one each time you are refuted. I am certainly happy to link each one from your own public user page if you like.
If you want to discuss more you have to tell people what you want to discuss, or try and do an analysis of why it is wrong if you can, instead of hoping people read your mind and being disappointed when they don't.
I didn't know you were a mod. You see any mention of Agenda 21 as something but you don't know your hindend from page 9 about Agenda 21. Keep up the good work as I am sure that you will be one of the top students at the Alinsky school for radicals if you do.
What I was trying to point out was that Bachmann doesn't like Agenda 21 but you missed that part. huh?
If you want to discuss more you have to tell people what you want to discuss,
Good luck with that.
Previous threads he's started on Agenda 21 he's proven completely incapable/unwilling to answer any specific questions about it to have a discussion, just keeps calling people progs and accusing them of not having watched his video.
You asked if people believed they published it, and I did with a concise explanation why. It also is your forth thread raving about this, and you have started a new one each time you are refuted. I am certainly happy to link each one from your own public user page if you like.
If you want to discuss more you have to tell people what you want to discuss, or try and do an analysis of why it is wrong if you can, instead of hoping people read your mind and being disappointed when they don't.
I got to thinking about your fourth (sp) thread bull and realized that you were talking about Agenda 21 not the fact that the lady has come out against Agenda 21. When will you make an attempt to learn something about Agenda 21 and why she doesn't support it? You do know nothing, in great amounts, about that plan but you support it. Why would that be?
BTW, this is the first time I have posted anything about Bachmann and Agenda 21. Please try to do your counting about the connection, not just the plan.
Previous threads he's started on Agenda 21 he's proven completely incapable/unwilling to answer any specific questions about it to have a discussion, just keeps calling people progs and accusing them of not having watched his video.
Have you noticed how mods have combined threads about Agenda 21 when sometimes there was no way other than the term Agenda 21? I can't get on a combined thread and talk to people who know nothing about it and refuse to learn anything about it. Don't you see that all you people start throwing in your little bits on nothing randomly from more than one thread? Well of course not.
I don't get it. I understand that some people don't care about the environment, but what's the point of being outwardly against it? Seriously?
Are you referring to questions about Agenda 21, to Mother Jones, to Michelle Bachmann or to me? I can't answer unless I know what you are talking about.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
