Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-29-2014, 08:40 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,750,585 times
Reputation: 13868

Advertisements

The answer is obvious. The primary sponsors of Al Qaeda and other Sunni terrorists are likely none other than the “pro-Western” Arab oil-producing states. The citizens of these countries are relatively poor, yet, their ruling princes pocket the national oil wealth and live in incredible opulence.

Yet Obama won't allow the Keystone pipeline

Articles: Who Finances the Terrorists?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-30-2014, 12:59 AM
 
Location: Los Awesome, CA
8,653 posts, read 6,136,760 times
Reputation: 3368
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
The answer is obvious. The primary sponsors of Al Qaeda and other Sunni terrorists are likely none other than the “pro-Western” Arab oil-producing states. The citizens of these countries are relatively poor, yet, their ruling princes pocket the national oil wealth and live in incredible opulence.

Yet Obama won't allow the Keystone pipeline

Articles: Who Finances the Terrorists?
What does this have to do with the Keystone pipeline?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 01:03 AM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,531,049 times
Reputation: 2052
Agree with first reply. What on earth does financing terror have to do with a pipeline?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 04:23 AM
 
Location: Great Britain
2,737 posts, read 3,166,084 times
Reputation: 1450
I am glad to see Americans agree that funding terrorism is wrong.

BBC News | AMERICAS | Rich friends in New York
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 04:45 AM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,946,153 times
Reputation: 11790
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310 View Post
What does this have to do with the Keystone pipeline?
Quote:
Originally Posted by nvxplorer View Post
Agree with first reply. What on earth does financing terror have to do with a pipeline?
Petch is one of those who suffer from Obama Derangement Syndrome; he finds any excuse, even the least remotely possible one, to blame Obama on something. Had a bad day at work? Obama's fault. Have a bad itch you can't get rid of? It's Obama Water, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,177,123 times
Reputation: 21743
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
The answer is obvious. The primary sponsors of Al Qaeda and other Sunni terrorists are likely none other than the “pro-Western” Arab oil-producing states.
And the US.

The US wasn't funding al-Qaeda activities in Yugoslavia?

Yes, you were.

Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
The citizens of these countries are relatively poor, yet, their ruling princes pocket the national oil wealth and live in incredible opulence.
And yet you murdered King Faisal II in cold blood; murdered General Qasim in cold-blood; attempted 3x to murder Prime Minister Mossadeq of Iran, and then overthrew his government and installed the Shah; you installed and supported King Hussein of Jordan, and then King Abdullah of Jordan and the King Abdullah II, who disbanded parliament.

You overthrew the Syrian government.

You repeatedly attempted to murder and overthrow the government of Nasser (Egypt) for the heinous crime of Declaring Neutrality While Non-White.

Worse than that, Nasser overthrew King Farouk. I'm guessing you don't understand that the Saudis considered that a threat to monarchy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
Yet Obama won't allow the Keystone pipeline
Thread Fail O' The Day.

How stupid and ignorant are Keystone supporters?

Let's find out.

US law prohibits the export of crude oil. Ford exempted Alaskan North Slope Crude (including Prudhoe Bay). Clinton -- under tremendous pressure from the State of California, exempted a certain number of barrels of California Heavy.

Let's see if we can think critically for once in our lives and apply some freaking common sense.

If it is illegal to export crude oil, then what is the implication of that?

Well, it means every barrel of oil in the US must be refined, before it can be exported.

How many operating crude oil refineries exist in the US?

46.

How of those 46 operating refineries produce gasoline?

16.

Again, let's see if we can think critically and apply some freaking common sense.

What conclusions can you draw about refining capacity in the US?

Refining capacity is limited, restricted, static, unchanging etc etc etc....no matter what you do, with all 46 refineries running flat out at max capacity, you can only refine X barrels of oil per day, and no more than that.

What conclusions can you draw about gasoline supply in the US?

No matter what you do, with all 16 refineries running flat out at max capacity, you can only refine X barrels of oil per day into gasoline, and no more than that.

Now....who wants to ask a really stupid question like, "Why is the US importing gasoline?"

Now....who wants to ask another really stupid question like, "If the US is importing gasoline, why is the US exporting gasoline?"

I just explained why.

California Heavy: 1 barrel yields 6 gallons of gasoline
Oklahoma Heavy: 1 barrel yields 6 gallons of gasoline
Louisiana Heavy: 1 barrel yields 6 gallons of gasoline

If you wanted to increase the gasoline supply in the US, what could you do?

Build another refinery? Yeah, but that works only if you can increase your oil production. There's a better way...

Illinois Intermediate: 1 barrel yields 13 gallons of gasoline


Boooom! Just like that you have -- through the magic of organic chemistry -- doubled your gasoline supply.

What if you need to increase your gasoline supply to ensure you can meet future demand from US consumers?

Tijuana Light, Bonny Light, Basra Light, Arabian Light, Brent Blend: 1 barrel yields 22-24 gallons gasoline.

Wow! Through the magic of organic chemistry, you have once again doubled your gasoline supply, without building new refineries.


What does the OP and all Keystone supporters want?

The OP and Keystone supporters want to cripple the economy of the US, by importing Canadian Tar Sands.

Tar Sands: 1 barrel yields 4-7 gallons of gasoline

What happens to the gasoline supply in the US? It decreases.

What happens to the price of gasoline in the US? It sky-rockets.

Don't forget that Bush signed off on EPA Tier 3, which restricts gasoline to 15 ppm of Sulfur.

Tijuana Light with 1,000 ppm is no big deal.....90 minutes per barrel on Sulfur Redux and you're done.

East Texas Sour? That's 50,000 ppm.

Canadian Tar Sands?

80,000 ppm to 90,000 pm depending on which field.

To run Sulfur Redux on Tar Sands for every 3 days of production, you lose 1 day.


What happens to the gasoline supply in the US? It decreases.

What happens to the price of gasoline in the US? It sky-rockets.


Now does everyone understand why you are simultaneously importing and exporting gasoline?


Unita Basin Black Wax, Fracked Oil.....those are garbage oils.

You run the them through the refinery producing kerosene (aviation fuel), gasoline, diesels, bunker fuel or whatever you want....and you don't spend the time or money to run the Sulfur Redux.

You cannot sell that gasoline or diesel in the US, but you can export it to other countries, and better still, you get a higher profit exporting gasoline than selling gasoline in the US.

So....how's "Drill, baby, drill!" working out for everyone?

I told you all right here on C-D that was a failed policy and you would suffer.

So......make my day.....bring the Keystone down, and watch gasoline prices hit $7-$8/gallon.

Laughing at the superior intellect....

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 12:01 PM
 
3,555 posts, read 4,097,568 times
Reputation: 1632
Is the answer Reagan?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 02:32 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,384,355 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
If you wanted to increase the gasoline supply in the US, what could you do?

Build another refinery? Yeah, but that works only if you can increase your oil production. There's a better way...
Laughing at the superior intellect....

Mircea
I always am entertained by Mircea. He sounds so right to himself I imagine.

Actually no we dont tend to build more refinery's, we tend to expand existing ones. like the Port arthur one that just recently increased its crude oil capacity from 275,000 barrels a day to 600,000.

As for crude oil production? You have noticed how much is coming out of North Dakota recently haven't you?

So basically we're getting more oil, and making more gasoline.

That of course ties in directly with this foolish statement:


Quote:
Refining capacity is limited, restricted, static, unchanging etc etc etc....no matter what you do, with all 46 refineries running flat out at max capacity, you can only refine X barrels of oil per day, and no more than that.
More lies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 08:42 PM
 
Location: Los Awesome, CA
8,653 posts, read 6,136,760 times
Reputation: 3368
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
Petch is one of those who suffer from Obama Derangement Syndrome; he finds any excuse, even the least remotely possible one, to blame Obama on something. Had a bad day at work? Obama's fault. Have a bad itch you can't get rid of? It's Obama Water, etc.
There are many people with this personality type that loves to blame their own failures on others. Attacking Obama eases the pain for him I guess...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 09:20 PM
 
1,806 posts, read 1,738,449 times
Reputation: 988
Religious conservatives finance them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top