Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Watch them now deflect and blame Obama and the Democrats.
You have to wonder that someone who spends this much time making threads, and attacking people different form themselves, has going on in their life. They probably do not work and have a job but are too preoccupied with attacking others.
Regardless on how you feel about the pollster, you have to still deal with the fact of what he was saying is true. The refuticans have said on more than one occasion that their goal is to make Obama a one term president!
This to me along with the Norquist pledge, proves to me that the republicans have only their own best interest at heart.......screw the people
On the contrary...bringing down Obama is obviously the single best way to create jobs and help the economy recover. It was their love of prosperity and growth that drove the top priority. You make an error by confusing hatred of destructive policies with animus toward Obama.
It was a good thing that the unemployment rate was low BEFORE he took office and the only people that was guaranteed employment was the military. Bush and the "job creators" were doing such a great job people flocked to the republican party for an encore
Location: planet octupulous is nearing earths atmosphere
13,621 posts, read 12,731,507 times
Reputation: 20050
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene
Obama talks, talks, talks a good game on his interest in creating jobs and his recent talk about "in sourcing" jobs, but we all know that's a bunch of BS and politics is his overriding concern, which is pretty outrageous considering his rhetoric.
The November 2010 elections showed the democrats their worse defeat in almost 100 years. ....And putting in all of those teabaggers proved what? They have no clue to the word "compromise" and was more than willing to let the country "crash and burn" to get tax breaks for the wealthy passed
The message of the majority of Americans was clear. Yes, and they are mad look at congress's approval rating....guess who is in charge of that
The majority spoke and the representatives are suppose to listen. To their wealthy donors
We want Obamas out of control wasteful spending stopped, we demanded that we do not spend more then we take in, we demanded that the policies Obama, Reid and Pelosi put in place be stopped.
..And give it back to it's rightful owners....the wealthy and the war machine
So now you are against what we hired these guys to do?
I'm against what those clowns in the GOP circus is trying to do
The majority did not like the road Obama was taking us and with that being said we the majority removed Obamas back door dealings and shady decisions.
Just wait until Mitt has to pay back all of those "favors" to the people giving him millions to win the nomination. Then the party will really begin!
And we are going to remove him from the WH come November, so get used to it.
...And then we are going to war with Iran, I hope that your grandchildren are ready
...And then we are going to war with Iran, I hope that your grandchildren are ready
Our grandchildren are already paying for obama's outlandish spending.....we won't even count 2009, in 2010 until today he has spent what, 3 trillion+, more than any other president....sorry, but that's the left....
Three years into a presidency, the previous president cannot still be blamed. The Non-partisan GAO confirmed that in BO's first nineteen months in office he had tripled? dang I will find it to report it, the debt that took Bush eight years or something like that.
No, it's all on the annointed one, now.
Yes, as soon as he got into office many of us were wanting him out. He is a Subversive Communist and worthy of handcuffs.
Here is a question for you, since you have not idea about how the government is suppose to work or a clue about economics. Bush had 8 eight years to screw up the economy with an uncessary war among other things, so how long do you really think that it would take to fix it? Oh one more thing he still has people working towards the same destructive policies and are still in D.C fighting any possible change.
Let me put it this way for you, someone gives you an anchor while you are trying to swim, after awhile you manage to get the anchor out of your hands, but now it is on your feet are you still treading water?
gwb is and will remain the focus of true and honest blame for the ills of this country by many citizens for years to come. He owns it.
Good thing some of you don't get some of the things you want and there will never be any handcuffs for President Obama.
If buddy Bush did not get any for sending over 5000 of our troops to a war based on a lie, and murdering over 100,000 iraqis.....well no one should go to jail.
That is what it is like for anything, but the actual sun and wind are free.
And you cannot make progress in alternative energy sources if we continue to act as if Oil, gas, coal, and nuclear power are the only ways.
Progress is not "made", let alone designed to order. we can't arbitrarily "decide" which of her secrets mother Nature is going to give up --- if so, energy would be dirt cheap and we'd all live hundreds of years longer.
Most of the great advances aren't made my either government- or coroporate-directed efforts. Bureaucracy has no interest in "solving" a problem -- that would eliminate the need for bureaucrats. The breakthroughs usually come from one determined individual working alone. And as often as not, the process simply involves re-arranging the technology we already have.
It's a blatant lie to claim "the sun and wind are free" -- somebody has to do both the research and the work to make that power usable, and to maintain the netwotrk that distributes it.
But that point doesn't go over well with the grown-up children at OWS, and the Lefty politicians who pander to them.
Because the inevitable result of a global economy is that the whiners and complainers can no longer count on their politcal flunkies to lock out the trends that are going to force them either to do work that isn't up to their expectations, or learn to live on a lot less.
Here is a question for you, since you have not idea about how the government is suppose to work or a clue about economics. Bush had 8 eight years to screw up the economy with an uncessary war among other things, so how long do you really think that it would take to fix it? Oh one more thing he still has people working towards the same destructive policies and are still in D.C fighting any possible change.
Let me put it this way for you, someone gives you an anchor while you are trying to swim, after awhile you manage to get the anchor out of your hands, but now it is on your feet are you still treading water?
Nice try, but the Blame Bush shipped has sailed. The economy and environment under Bush wasn't even close to being so horrible that it would take 3+ years of a Dem WH, senate and congress to fix. Not to mention the fact that the recession was over years ago.
Recessions come and go. But Obama has managed to take a routine recession that should have recovered into a depression. Can't blame Bush for that.
That is what it is like for anything, but the actual sun and wind are free.
So are oil and natural gas in the ground.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
