Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-23-2012, 11:10 PM
 
27,145 posts, read 15,322,979 times
Reputation: 12072

Advertisements

"Raise the minimum wage to $12 an hour and poof no more working poor!"


Then the cost of everything goes up and that $12. is worth $7.........back to square one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-23-2012, 11:53 PM
 
409 posts, read 318,672 times
Reputation: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Actually the last hot water heater that went bad on me I spent about $400 for a instant hot water tank, I got about $150 back from the tax credit, and I installed it myself for free. Total out of pocket $250, 1/4th of what you suggested one would pay.
Call me in 5 years when the tank rusts out! A PRO could have told you that!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2012, 11:55 PM
 
409 posts, read 318,672 times
Reputation: 49
Look on that data plate. That SOB is firing at 170,000 to 190,000+ BTUs. A standard is between 35,000 and 40,000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2012, 12:06 AM
 
409 posts, read 318,672 times
Reputation: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nite Ryder View Post
No, it wouldn't save the government (tax payers) more money, it would put more people out of work. More employer's would simply get by with few workers, and lay off a few of the one's they have employed now that are not really needed. It is easy to forget there are people who are not worth $10 an hour and employers won't continue to pay someone who is not worth it. People in the United States somehow thing they are worth a high wage, yet so many are not willing to work for their money. Too many people want a job and a pay check, without the work connected with it.
We'll remember all of that when your Honda Accord needs a timing BELT at 75 clicks. You'll get charged 600 bucks while the poor b*stard doing it is eating a cold Big Mac with dirty finger nails for lunch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2012, 12:16 AM
 
30,896 posts, read 36,965,098 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by gizmo980 View Post
Yeah, that.

Do you guys have any idea how much it costs to live in San Francisco? I lived there for 4 years making nearly triple of the minimum wage - living in a reasonably-priced house in an iffy neighborhood with 2 roommates, and fairly low monthly expenses. And I was barely scraping by every month! The recent increase is a move in the right direction, but $10/hr is still basically poverty around here.
In the case of high cost areas like the Bay Area, a better solution would be to actually build more housing! Increase supply and it puts a lid on rents. Limited housing supply is what drives the high cost of living on the coasts. Granted, there is limited land available in the Bay Area, but much of the land that is still available must go through ridiculously stringent environmental laws put in place and defended by elitist NIMBYs.

If you increase the minimum wage, but don't increase the housing supply, you have more money chasing the same number of housing units = higher rents. This applies to other goods & services as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2012, 12:20 AM
 
409 posts, read 318,672 times
Reputation: 49
Pick your POISON people. Sandbox can tell you just about everytime you get RIPPED OFF and makes the business richer! Name it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2012, 12:25 AM
 
409 posts, read 318,672 times
Reputation: 49
I want to do doughnuts on THEIR golfcourse with my 4X4! Ain't war hell? LMAO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2012, 12:36 AM
 
30,896 posts, read 36,965,098 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Walmart can afford it.

I understand that small businesses can't afford to pay that much, but any huge corporation as successful as Walmart can afford to pay all of their employees at least $10/hour.
WalMart's profit margin is typically quite low, in the 3% to 4% range, which is typical for just about all retail outlets. Their profit numbers may be big, but they have to sell an awful lot of stuff to make those profits. I have no love of WalMart, but your statement is really ignorant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2012, 12:40 AM
 
30,896 posts, read 36,965,098 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
"It's NOT 1989 anymore."

True, thanks to logistics, the world is an employers available workforce. You no longer hold them hostage, and for that reason, unskilled labor is now paid like unskilled labor. The gap b/w lower skilled manufacturing and McD's was too large, for too long, and made the workforce soft in the process..
This is true.


Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
Now both employer and employee are free to choose their best deal..anywhere.
But this is not. Sure, employers are free to pick up and move their operations elsewhere, but since when can most employees (especially at the low/mid end) pick up and move to other countries???? Practically never.

Last edited by mysticaltyger; 01-24-2012 at 01:17 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2012, 12:44 AM
 
30,896 posts, read 36,965,098 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Give us a break. You guys don't want to lift people up. You want to beat them down. Your theory is that if you make people suffer, you'll force them to make more money - somehow. It's not realistic.
No, it's more like conservatives understand that most of the time, we are our own worst enemies. Liberals tend to think it's "out there" with "the other guy".

I still maintain our biggest problem is the 40% out of wedlock birth rate. Kids born into one parent families are at a disadvantage in education, emotionally, financially, and a whole lot of other ways. It's the elephant in the room liberals don't want to talk about (although a few do--see link below):

Forget Juno. Out-of-wedlock births are a national catastrophe. - Slate Magazine
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top