Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Right wingers are trying to change the rules in the middle of the game. If the current calculation method is being changed, then all past numbers need to be restated because without it, the trend would be false.
Right wingers are trying to change the rules in the middle of the game. If the current calculation method is being changed, then all past numbers need to be restated because without it, the trend would be false.
I guess, if what you are having is a *****ing match with past presidents. However, if you are concerned with what's happening NOW, then the formula is certainly valid.
I guess, if what you are having is a *****ing match with past presidents. However, if you are concerned with what's happening NOW, then the formula is certainly valid.
That's just stupid.
The formula is only meaningful as a comparison over time.
Change the formula without restating all past numbers and it becomes useless.
Still grasping for the straws? Face it, in spite of the best GOP efforts, the Economy is recovering.
Maybe for you. We just got hit with a whomping 20% pay cut and a lay off coming in April. I'll probably be a 99er before it's all over. Great recovery...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.