Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-02-2012, 05:13 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,268,118 times
Reputation: 4269

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
How many duplicate threads are we up to on this now?

Apparently Media Matters is paying trolls well on this talking point.
Would MM stoop so low as to sic trolls on us? Well now that I think of it it may be possible. I have heard from people on Fox that they had a nice (can you believe it) thing about Breitbart yesterday.

 
Old 03-02-2012, 05:13 PM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,701,448 times
Reputation: 23295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
The woman went before Congress(!) and informed them that she and many other women were engaging in sex with multiple unmarried (to them) male partners. And that she wanted the University to pay to make it possible and "safe".

How is this NOT "sluttish" or "whoreish" behavior? And what's the problem with calling it what it is?
Well according to Merriam Webster the world wide authority of the definitions of words a **** is defined as a promiscuous woman.

Huh imagine that. Rush was just using information from the most well known and respected reference source in the world.
 
Old 03-02-2012, 05:15 PM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,701,448 times
Reputation: 23295
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
How many duplicate threads are we up to on this now?

Apparently Media Matters is paying trolls well on this talking point.
Bring-em. Like stomping on cockroaches when you turn the lights on.
 
Old 03-02-2012, 05:15 PM
 
32,064 posts, read 15,062,274 times
Reputation: 13688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
The woman went before Congress(!) and informed them that she and many other women were engaging in sex with multiple unmarried (to them) male partners. And that she wanted the University to pay to make it possible and "safe".

How is this NOT "sluttish" or "whoreish" behavior? And what's the problem with calling it what it is?
When a guy does this he's called a stud Maybe that's the problem.
 
Old 03-02-2012, 05:15 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,268,118 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by badhornet View Post
Rich and ugly gets you laid

Ugly alone doesn't
Which are you? You seem to know quite a bit about all this.
 
Old 03-02-2012, 05:16 PM
 
11,531 posts, read 10,290,404 times
Reputation: 3580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogdad View Post
Well according to Merriam Webster the world wide authority of the definitions of words a **** is defined as a promiscuous woman.

Huh imagine that. Rush was just using information from the most well known and respected reference source in the world.
Figures that someone as ugly as Rush would need a dictionary versus real life experience to know that definition.
 
Old 03-02-2012, 05:19 PM
 
10,793 posts, read 13,545,862 times
Reputation: 6189
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
Amazingly, the Republican Party's de-facto leader, Rush Limbaugh, called a bright young woman a "Sl_t" over her testimony concerning contraception, and his constituents in the GOP do not condemn his remarks, showing how morally degraded and misogynistic the party has become.

Thankfully we have a President who is a real man and took the time to call this woman and speak to her like she deserves to be spoken to, while the Republican leadership continues to cower before the hopped up carnival barker Rush Limbaugh.

This once proud political party has been reduced to this. Sad, and sad for America.

President Obama calls Sandra Fluke, student labeled a

I guess Bill Maher is the Democratic Party Leader!!

Obama never denounced him.....matter of fact, Barack (the real man) just took a million dollar donation from that mysogenistic PIG!



Low-brow: Bill Maher says Sarah Palin is a 'dumb ****' - YouTube
 
Old 03-02-2012, 05:21 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,392,719 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by badhornet View Post
Rich and ugly gets you laid

Ugly alone doesn't
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogdad View Post
Rich wins every time.
Especially with Dominican hookers.
 
Old 03-02-2012, 05:23 PM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,701,448 times
Reputation: 23295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Savoir Faire View Post
Figures that someone as ugly as Rush would need a dictionary versus real life experience to know that definition.
Wow you need some new material.
 
Old 03-02-2012, 05:23 PM
 
Location: New Mexico
8,396 posts, read 9,442,882 times
Reputation: 4070
Default Deafening Silence from Republican's over Party Leader's calling Law Student a misogynistic slur

Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
Amazingly, the Republican Party's de-facto leader, Rush Limbaugh, called a bright young woman a "Sl_t" over her testimony concerning contraception, and his constituents in the GOP do not condemn his remarks, showing how morally degraded and misogynistic the party has become.

Thankfully we have a President who is a real man and took the time to call this woman and speak to her like she deserves to be spoken to, while the Republican leadership continues to cower before the hopped up carnival barker Rush Limbaugh.

This once proud political party has been reduced to this. Sad, and sad for America.

President Obama calls Sandra Fluke, student labeled a

I've never seen anything like this.

That young woman just wanted to appear before an all-male GOP house committee to give a female perspective on what is essentially a female issue, and the right is absolutley losing their minds over it.

Look, Limbaugh acting like a petulant swine is no surprise to anyone, and he does things like this to boost his ratings.


But not one among the Republican leaders dares to offer a peep of criticism when this guy who acts as the spritual guide for the GOP steps so far out of bounds by attacking an individual citizen who isn't a public figure.

Republicans, you had to go a long way to lose a guy like me, who voted GOP for decades. But you passed me by a long time ago and you're still accelerating in the wrong direction.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:50 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top