Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-04-2012, 10:55 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,934,013 times
Reputation: 12828

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edu983 View Post
While other countries invest in education, universal healthcare, bullet trains, you-name-it, 51 percent of your taxes go to military spending aka "wars". .....
Considering that 47% pay no federal income tax at all that leaves a minority funding the national defense of this country.

I have no problem with military spending for our own national defense. Providing for the national defense is a Constitutional responsibility of our federal government whereas the remainder of the list from the OP is not. We are not a Socialist country....yet (getting their fast under Obama though).

My problem is in our military being used in pre-emptive undeclared wars for the global elite along with "nation building" to drain the wealth from the USA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-04-2012, 11:03 PM
 
Location: NoVA
1,391 posts, read 2,646,465 times
Reputation: 1972
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Considering that 47% pay no federal income tax at all that leaves a minority funding the national defense of this country.

I have no problem with military spending for our own national defense. Providing for the national defense is a Constitutional responsibility of our federal government whereas the remainder of the list from the OP is not. We are not a Socialist country....yet (getting their fast under Obama though).

My problem is in our military being used in pre-emptive undeclared wars for the global elite along with "nation building" to drain the wealth from the USA.
How does that make the remaining 53% a minority? 53 is larger than 47, no?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2012, 04:32 AM
 
Location: 77441
3,160 posts, read 4,366,895 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edu983 View Post
While other countries invest in education, universal healthcare, bullet trains, you-name-it, 51 percent of your taxes go to military spending aka "wars".


thanks, good to know.

You realize the "other countries" get away with no military budget because they owe their very existance to the umbrella the US Military provides for them ?


no, I supect you have no clue ....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2012, 06:22 AM
 
23,976 posts, read 15,082,290 times
Reputation: 12952
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bily Lovec View Post
thanks, good to know.

You realize the "other countries" get away with no military budget because they owe their very existance to the umbrella the US Military provides for them ?


no, I supect you have no clue ....
Yes, I do know this and have wondered why for years. Why were we in Germany and So. Korea for years. It certainly was more for our benefit than theirs. Access is what it was about.

I'm beginning to have grave doubts about an organization that says it protects it's own and then puts our wounded in places like that falling apart hospital in DC. To add insult to injury they dispose of service peoples remains in dumps. I'll never believe another word those baztards at the Pentagon say.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2012, 06:38 AM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,479,163 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by ♪♫♪♪♫♫♪♥ View Post
How does that make the remaining 53% a minority? 53 is larger than 47, no?
Arithmetic is elitist snobbery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2012, 07:00 AM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,418,303 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by 313Weather View Post
Why should 52% of my tax dollars go to destroying other people's countries and having my fellow citizens killed to further push the agenda of the NWO?

This is tyranny!!!
Why should 48% of my money go to other people's households? Destroying my household wealth to push some liberal, rainbow agenda?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2012, 01:30 PM
 
Location: Flippin AR
5,513 posts, read 5,241,036 times
Reputation: 6243
With such a huge military--larger than all the others in the world put together--you'd think we could DEFEND OUR OWN BORDERS.

Does anyone really think 9/11 would have happened, if we weren't constantly waging war overseas?

Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate who will defend our borders and stop bankrupting us by keeping us as the Nazi Germany of the post-WWII world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2012, 01:34 PM
 
994 posts, read 725,041 times
Reputation: 449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edu983 View Post
While other countries invest in education, universal healthcare, bullet trains, you-name-it, 51 percent of your taxes go to military spending aka "wars".
Yes, and...? You say that like it's a bad thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2012, 01:40 PM
 
2,930 posts, read 2,224,453 times
Reputation: 1024
Quote:
Originally Posted by NHartphotog View Post
With such a huge military--larger than all the others in the world put together--you'd think we could DEFEND OUR OWN BORDERS.

Does anyone really think 9/11 would have happened, if we weren't constantly waging war overseas?

Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate who will defend our borders and stop bankrupting us by keeping us as the Nazi Germany of the post-WWII world.
Ron Paul's chances of being a presidential contender are "slim and none",......and "slim" is on his way out of town on a horse.

Ron Paul can have an effect upon this presidential race,.....he can run as a third party candidate and guarantee Obama a win. Paul might get some of his ideas on planks in the repobican platform, but he can't win the nomination,....and couldn't beat Obama even if he did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2012, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Keosauqua, Iowa
9,614 posts, read 21,270,240 times
Reputation: 13670
Quote:
Originally Posted by WIHS2006 View Post
Id rather we spend it on the military than do nothing welfare leeches. At least the military serves a purpose.

National defense is a critical spending objective, welfare is not.
This might be a valid point if not for the fact that most of our military spending has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with our national defense.

Last edited by duster1979; 03-07-2012 at 12:32 PM.. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top