Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Follow the Iceland example of liberty? That country is in worse shape than the U.S. They've had numerous government changes in the last 3 years, they are bankrupt, their money is worthless. They owe the British and Dutch billions of dollars and are being sued in European courts.
When I was forced to live there for a year, the Parliment was controlled by communists and there wasn't much 'liberty' happening.
The real fact of the matter if we held people to breaking finacial laws then we have alot of normal citizens who are co-conspitators with signed documents as evidence.
Screw these excuses. Normal citizens do not fall under the regulations of Sarbanes/Oxley. I completely dismiss your argument as being any sort of rationalization here.
Normal citizens were not selling people investments that were known to be bad, as good, and then betting they would fail.
The govt and bansksters are in bed together. Letting the looting continue is unsustainable. Iceland did the right thing by dealing with it up front and early. Now they have moved on. One way or the other "reality" sets in.
Actions determine the form that occurs when "unsustainable" reaches critical or whether the "unsustainable" continues.
Follow the Iceland example of liberty? That country is in worse shape than the U.S. They've had numerous government changes in the last 3 years, they are bankrupt, their money is worthless. They owe the British and Dutch billions of dollars and are being sued in European courts.
When I was forced to live there for a year, the Parliment was controlled by communists and there wasn't much 'liberty' happening.
You are clueless. Iceland came out of the hard times better than any EU country. Because they protected their citizens rather than the bankers who gambled with their money.
Follow the Iceland example of liberty? That country is in worse shape than the U.S. They've had numerous government changes in the last 3 years, they are bankrupt, their money is worthless. They owe the British and Dutch billions of dollars and are being sued in European courts.
When I was forced to live there for a year, the Parliment was controlled by communists and there wasn't much 'liberty' happening.
You are clueless. Iceland came out of the hard times better than any EU country. Because they protected their citizens rather than the bankers who gambled with their money.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
