Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ah, mrclose, I was responding to the post below which you have now interjected yourself in.....and for what reason may I ask. And yes I do read and have a high compression level, thank you. I'm not sure why you are trying to insult me though. Maybe you could enlighten me on that.
Originally Posted by sol11
I'd wager one can't buy beer or cigarettes with a college either.
But college kids have ID yet that's not acceptable
ID's from colleges and Universities are acceptable in PA, the issue there is the ID's need an expiration and some don't in which case they would have to go and get a PA ID.
Ah, mrclose, I was responding to the post below which you have now interjected yourself in.....and for what reason may I ask. And yes I do read and have a high compression level, thank you. I'm not sure why you are trying to insult me though. Maybe you could enlighten me on that.
Originally Posted by sol11
I'd wager one can't buy beer or cigarettes with a college either.
What say you now?
Not insulting you and as you have now confirmed my point .. we can move on.
The post that I was responding to of your's was this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469
I'm sure a lot don't especially when you live in a city that a car isn't required to get around. So why bother getting one. My kids didn't have one....so what. What's wrong with a college ID. You want people to show ID when they vote yet you have to approve what ID that is because maybe the ID they have is just not good enough for you
I answered you!
You either didn't read the post .. didn't comprehend the post or .. just ignored it!
BTW: I bold-ed comprehend for a reason.
(You may want to 'proof read' your post?)
This is the third court ruling in the past three days out of the federal courts striking down Republican voter laws. A federal panel on Wednesday blocked a Florida registration measure from continuing in effect. South Carolina's strict photo ID law is on trial in front of another three-judge panel in the same federal courthouse. A court ruling in the South Carolina case is expected in time for the November election.
An appeal is likely in the Texas case, but there is no guarantee that the U.S. Supreme Court is going to want to get involved in this case, or any of these voting rights case, before the election. On the other hand, the justices in 2008 said that states could impose some voter identification restrictions.
Is this really surprising? Texas would vote Republican without this, but it is not too far away from being blue come November. I think that the Republicans who are in control are scared and are doing their best so in case of Hispanics coming out in large numbers and voting Democratic they are securing their state to be red. There is also the fact that those who are responsible for implementing these programs are doing so with racial undertones.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And I think the compression problem is all yours
