Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-26-2012, 08:59 AM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,980,467 times
Reputation: 4555

Advertisements

Did the GOP leadership uphold their duties, and make a concerted effort to stop Obama from attacking and sticking his nose in the affairs of Libya?

Nope.

Because they love using the military to attack and kill as long it's for "good outcomes"

You have nothing but yourselves to blame. I'm not voting for Obama out of principle. You will eagerly vote for Republicans who condone breaking the law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-26-2012, 09:05 AM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,037,907 times
Reputation: 3603
Another liberal deflection. To know what we now know about this, and then to say you are voting for Obama out of "principle", is that a joke? You have some extremely poor principles to vote for a liar and an Administration that hasnt just failed in the economy but continues to lie and cover up about the terror attack in Libya.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
Did the GOP leadership uphold their duties, and make a concerted effort to stop Obama from attacking and sticking his nose in the affairs of Libya?

Nope.

Because they love using the military to attack and kill as long it's for "good outcomes"

You have nothing but yourselves to blame. I'm not voting for Obama out of principle. You will eagerly vote for Republicans who condone breaking the law.
It wasn't just the GOP. Neither the House nor the Senate did anything about the drone attack of Libya.
They sat silently when they received "the memo" from the President about his decision to send in the drones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 09:12 AM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,587,085 times
Reputation: 2823
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
Did the GOP leadership uphold their duties, and make a concerted effort to stop Obama from attacking and sticking his nose in the affairs of Libya?

Nope.

Because they love using the military to attack and kill as long it's for "good outcomes"

You have nothing but yourselves to blame. I'm not voting for Obama out of principle. You will eagerly vote for Republicans who condone breaking the law.
Are you on the wrong thread?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 09:20 AM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,950,438 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trace21230 View Post
Link: Bombshell: US knew Stevens assassination was work of terrorists within 24 hours of attack « Hot Air

Wow.

If this were a Republican administration the national media/DNC propaganda wing would be running stories on it NONSTOP 24/7.
So, the Obama administration did not reveal that they were actively investigating the incident through the CIA and they had leads? So you want the Obama to share all their intelligence gathering activities?

Thread fail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 09:23 AM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,037,907 times
Reputation: 3603
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
So, the Obama administration did not reveal that they were actively investigating the incident through the CIA and they had leads? So you want the Obama to share all their intelligence gathering activities?

Thread fail.
Post fail, yours.

They lied. They ignored warnings. No protection. No security. Lies afterwards and drumming up more anger over a video that had nothing to do with this.

We want accountability and honesty. And they did such a great job after the fact, that CNN was able to get Stevens journal and not the FBI/CIA. Only to have the State Dept whine about it.

There was a failure before, during and after this incident. That is why they lie about it and that is why the press gives them cover.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 09:25 AM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,037,907 times
Reputation: 3603
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 09:26 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
So, the Obama administration did not reveal that they were actively investigating the incident through the CIA and they had leads? So you want the Obama to share all their intelligence gathering activities?

Thread fail.
When CNN finds his journal first you have to wonder if any USG went to the bomb site afterwards to do any investigations.

Did CNN get to the Benghazi consulate before the USG ? Sure looks that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 09:30 AM
 
2,539 posts, read 4,087,650 times
Reputation: 999
God forbid, anything keep him from his campaign. They were just people that died. They meant nothing to him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 09:37 AM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,950,438 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilt11 View Post
Post fail, yours.

They lied. They ignored warnings. No protection. No security. Lies afterwards and drumming up more anger over a video that had nothing to do with this.

We want accountability and honesty. And they did such a great job after the fact, that CNN was able to get Stevens journal and not the FBI/CIA. Only to have the State Dept whine about it.

There was a failure before, during and after this incident. That is why they lie about it and that is why the press gives them cover.
I did not see anything in the OP that said that they had warning . That lie has been debunked repeatedly. The CIA was following up on leads after the fact, which is what the OP said. They were investigating.

Again, you are repeating lies that have been debunked and giving your own opinion without any basis in fact. That makes a thread fail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:41 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top