I have little doubt this is what The Register is getting fired up about.
Quote:
On a CO2 basis the estimated
global peatland carbon sink could potentially cause
a net negative radiative warming (i.e. cooling)
approaching -5 W m−2. Hence, when added to other
terrestrial and marine sinks, the final peatland sink
might be a decisive factor in lowering the
atmospheric CO2 concentration to the critical
threshold level required for neoglaciation, according
to the P/IAH.
|
Which would happen becuase...
Quote:
A higher humidity with increased precipitation
could lead to primary or increased marginal
paludification and hence increased peatland area.
|
Because
Quote:
The signal of future climate change across Sweden
is strongest for the winter season and in the northern
parts of the country, for both temperature and
precipitation.
|
This
is not a "nail in the coffin for climate change," as you say. Not only is climate changed acknowledged here, but it describes that increased temperatures and precipitation resulting from it,
could expand the Swedish peatlands, which
mightresult in a CO2 sink which could pull CO2 out of the air, combined with other sinks (like oceans and trees), end up lowering CO2.