Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-10-2012, 05:37 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,013,345 times
Reputation: 6128

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
It has been a long time since I took Civ Pro, but I would think that is more Personal Jurisdiction.
Certainly - but subject matter jurisdiction questions need to be settled first - personal jurisdiction doesn't matter much if the court in question isn't able to even deal with a case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-11-2012, 02:51 AM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,394,292 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
Certainly - but subject matter jurisdiction questions need to be settled first - personal jurisdiction doesn't matter much if the court in question isn't able to even deal with a case.
It might be because I am tired, but that makes no sense. Either state courts with general jurisdiction need personal jurisdiction, or a Federal court needs Diversity jurisdiction and doesn't care about personal jurisdiction. I have no idea why SMJ would matter in this case since absent some unknown facts state courts will have it and aside from getting it via diversity Feds will not because it is not a Federal question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2012, 02:53 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,286,152 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
Part of me says, if people want to hire folks that don't understand the law to represent them in court, let them. Part of me fears more idiots in the legal system. Of course, requiring passing the bar exam doesn't exactly prevent ignorance.
See Orly Taiz.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2012, 03:53 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
16,911 posts, read 10,594,283 times
Reputation: 16439
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
Diversity of jurisdiction isn't all that difficult to understand.
Diversity is easy, but the application of the correct rule or law can get tricky.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2012, 03:56 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
16,911 posts, read 10,594,283 times
Reputation: 16439
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
Even simple wills aren't that simple. Plus there are local rules that are county specific in some cases that can make probate much more expensive if you fall into certain traps.

Speaking of Legalzoom I would not trust it. My favorite ad from them was about how a legal zoom will held up in a state supreme court. I was laughing so hard when I heard that one because as any estate planing attorney knows, if your will even goes to court you have screwed up horribly.
IMO, using legal zoom is like looking up illness symptoms on the internet. Sure, it might be somewhat helpful for very minor things, but I wouldn't trust it for anything remotely important or serious. Plus, I have never used legal zoom but I'm sure there is some kind of liability waiver. It is unethical for an attorney to disclaim liability. So if your lawyer screws up you have recourse, if your box screws up then you might have none.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2012, 04:13 AM
 
1,520 posts, read 1,874,143 times
Reputation: 545
I always wanted to be a lawyer. When I was locked up many decades ago, I used to study law because I got interested in it. But I also knew my criminal record meant no law school would ever take me and, even if one did, the bar probably would not. So I dropped that idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2012, 04:27 PM
 
Location: Purgatory (A.K.A. Dallas, Texas)
5,007 posts, read 15,425,311 times
Reputation: 2463
Why should we require that person's entrusted with people's financial future or sometimes their very lives have a certain bit of training and certification? That's just silly talk right there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2012, 04:58 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,950,438 times
Reputation: 3159
Next lets let anyone practice medicine and perform dental work and fly commercial airplanes. I mean anyone can do it right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2012, 05:13 PM
 
Location: Purgatory (A.K.A. Dallas, Texas)
5,007 posts, read 15,425,311 times
Reputation: 2463
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
Next lets let anyone practice medicine and perform dental work and fly commercial airplanes. I mean anyone can do it right?

As long as you can pass the licensing exam, that's all that matters, right? What could you possibly learn in school that you can get off of Google in a few hours?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2012, 06:09 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,013,345 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by getmeoutofhere View Post
As long as you can pass the licensing exam, that's all that matters, right? What could you possibly learn in school that you can get off of Google in a few hours?
How to make sense of a vast amount of information - and boil it down to a coherent argument that successfully advocates for your position - also to select and apply the proper point of law that is appropriate for the situation.

That is what law school teaches - and what lawyers are expected to be able to do.

Think that you can just rely on Google? That might work work for a traffic citation - but it won't hold up in the world of probate, drafting contracts, dealing with property disputes, defending a client accused of murder, settling family law issues, or prosecuting a corrupt politician.

Last edited by Harrier; 11-11-2012 at 06:27 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:20 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top