Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Most Republicans claim to hate regulation of all sorts. Freedom of opportunity,etc. Freedom to frack. Freedom to sell weapons. Freedom to do payday loans. Freedom to do most things for a quick buck. Why then, do they want to legislate to control another person's love and marital life?
Most Republicans claim to hate regulation of all sorts. Freedom of opportunity,etc. Freedom to frack. Freedom to sell weapons. Freedom to do payday loans. Freedom to do most things for a quick buck. Why then, do they want to legislate to control another person's love and marital life?
Seems awfully hypocritical to me.
It's in contrast to how most Democrats support the idea of marrying your dog or horse.
And before anyone jumps my post I support gay marriage but really, do we need 50 threads on it, especially one as much of a strawman as this one?
Most Republicans claim to hate regulation of all sorts. Freedom of opportunity,etc. Freedom to frack. Freedom to sell weapons. Freedom to do payday loans. Freedom to do most things for a quick buck. Why then, do they want to legislate to control another person's love and marital life?
Seems awfully hypocritical to me.
"Intendedly", regulations are wrong-preventative, but they usually work out to be wrong causative.
Might be better if the court system worked, and if people had ethics and morals.
Corporations do not have ethics or morals, because, though they are persons, they are not people.
Most Republicans claim to hate regulation of all sorts. Freedom of opportunity,etc. Freedom to frack. Freedom to sell weapons. Freedom to do payday loans. Freedom to do most things for a quick buck. Why then, do they want to legislate to control another person's love and marital life?
Seems awfully hypocritical to me.
Why? There seems to be a tendency among people to give this "if you don't like regulations then why do you want regulation X?" argument. It really doesn't make any point. When have Republicans said they want total anarchy with no law? Never. So it's illegitimate reasoning to try to call they hypocritical for not opposing any particular law just because they oppose overregulation in general.
It's in contrast to how most Democrats support the idea of marrying your dog or horse.
And before anyone jumps my post I support gay marriage but really, do we need 50 threads on it, especially one as much of a strawman as this one?
I agree.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
