Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Who cares if they want a better wage? If I was earning $7 an hour in New York and saw my employer make millions by the minute I'd want a piece of the pie too! Do you really want a country where there are islands of extreme wealth amongst a sea of poverty? If so, I suggest you go to Colombia or Venezuela
Better that McDonalds shares a bit of its wealth than those workers break in to your house in the middle of night to make extra money
So if its a HS kid or a college kid living a comfortable life with their parents while they get through school, they also get this "living wage" as well? Doesn't make sense, sorry. Too many holes in the "living wage" concept.
Who cares if they want a better wage? If I was earning $7 an hour in New York and saw my employer make millions by the minute I'd want a piece of the pie too! Do you really want a country where there are islands of extreme wealth amongst a sea of poverty? If so, I suggest you go to Colombia or Venezuela
How do you know that all those franchise owners make millions ?
Each store is independently owned you know.
As a NYC resident, ultimately the customer would have to burden the cost of a pay/wage increase. Therefore, from where I sit, I would ONLY agree to a wage increase in exchange for a "welfare" decrease. Most of the people in fast food from what I can see in NYC are on some sort of food stamp, public assistance benefit. That being said, if their wages increase, it's only fair to assume that a decrease in social benefits should come.
I have to say I have never worked in that industry.
Not even some technically entry level positions get that much!!
Or TEACHERS of public schools with an education claim 15.00
This is unbelievable.
An In/Out by our house pays 10.75 an hour though.
As a NYC resident, ultimately the customer would have to burden the cost of a pay/wage increase. Therefore, from where I sit, I would ONLY agree to a wage increase in exchange for a "welfare" decrease. Most of the people in fast food from what I can see in NYC are on some sort of food stamp, public assistance benefit. That being said, if their wages increase, it's only fair to assume that a decrease in social benefits should come.
Well naturally if they are not making a living wage they qualify for food stamps and other assistance. The best way to get them off of public assistance is with an increase in wages. Corporations can afford it--the taxpayers can't.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.