Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-20-2012, 10:22 AM
 
Location: Portland, OR
9,855 posts, read 11,933,875 times
Reputation: 10028

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by CincyIU29 View Post
Yes, are you kidding? Just spend 20 minutes on World Bank DataBank and you'll be blown away.

But for the sake of elaborating...



The majority of gun related crimes are not mass shootings, but homicides that kill one to two people.

The vast majority of these crimes are committed in low income areas. Low income areas are more prone to violent crimes of all types including gun violence.

The above stats are common knowledge. I'd be happy to find studies if you like but any competent person can look something up on google scholar.

Continuing.

Most OECD (West European) countries, have what is called a compressed wage scale. A compressed wage scale occurs in a country with a high mean income with low income inequality. Thus, these countries have small populations of the low income people most likely to commit gun violence.

The US on the other hand, does not have what would be considered a compressed wage scale. (US Census Report) The US has a high rate of income inequality and a much higher rate of low income people. I'm sure most liberals would agree with this and most studies if not all agree the US has higher income inequality rates than W. Europe.

Therefore,

Since the United States has a higher proportion of low income people and low income people are far and away the most likely to commit gun crimes, it should not be surprising that the United States has a higher rate of gun crimes, based on these demographics.

For example, despite incredibly tough gun control laws, Chicago, particularly the poorer Southside has a very high rate of gun related homicides, compared to wealthy Southern suburbs with very high gun ownership rates, such as The Woodlands, TX or Mountain Brook, AL.

These demographics can be further broken down, but I believe this should suffice.
See... this is what I don't get. You KNOW what the problem is... can explain it succinctly and cogently... but then you utterly FAIL at coming to any suggestions for solving the problem. You've got to do that. Anything less is just rubbing our faces in it. Every Conservative can tell us why Assault Weapons bans won't work or limits on magazine size or any other kind of "gun control". Ok... what will? Doing nothing is no longer an option.

H

 
Old 12-20-2012, 10:25 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
261 posts, read 705,225 times
Reputation: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by redfish1 View Post
No, it blows my mind that it's only made an issue when rich white people get massacred.
They weren't all white and probably weren't all rich. You're the one who brought up race/money in this thread not "us". Normal people are just plain horrified and disgusted. My 5 year old daughter is biracial, so therefore I care less about the babies who got killed? It's the straw that broke the camel's back - deal with it.
 
Old 12-20-2012, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
261 posts, read 705,225 times
Reputation: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leisesturm View Post
See... this is what I don't get. You KNOW what the problem is... can explain it succinctly and cogently... but then you utterly FAIL at coming to any suggestions for solving the problem. You've got to do that. Anything less is just rubbing our faces in it. Every Conservative can tell us why Assault Weapons bans won't work or limits on magazine size or any other kind of "gun control". Ok... what will? Doing nothing is no longer an option.

H
No surprise there. It's just like their economic plan - do nothing.
 
Old 12-20-2012, 10:39 AM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,452,870 times
Reputation: 14266
Quote:
Originally Posted by CincyIU29 View Post
Yes, are you kidding? Just spend 20 minutes on World Bank DataBank and you'll be blown away.

But for the sake of elaborating...



The majority of gun related crimes are not mass shootings, but homicides that kill one to two people.

The vast majority of these crimes are committed in low income areas. Low income areas are more prone to violent crimes of all types including gun violence.

The above stats are common knowledge. I'd be happy to find studies if you like but any competent person can look something up on google scholar.

Continuing.

Most OECD (West European) countries, have what is called a compressed wage scale. A compressed wage scale occurs in a country with a high mean income with low income inequality. Thus, these countries have small populations of the low income people most likely to commit gun violence.

The US on the other hand, does not have what would be considered a compressed wage scale. (US Census Report) The US has a high rate of income inequality and a much higher rate of low income people. I'm sure most liberals would agree with this and most studies if not all agree the US has higher income inequality rates than W. Europe.

Therefore,

Since the United States has a higher proportion of low income people and low income people are far and away the most likely to commit gun crimes, it should not be surprising that the United States has a higher rate of gun crimes, based on these demographics.

For example, despite incredibly tough gun control laws, Chicago, particularly the poorer Southside has a very high rate of gun related homicides, compared to wealthy Southern suburbs with very high gun ownership rates, such as The Woodlands, TX or Mountain Brook, AL.

These demographics can be further broken down, but I believe this should suffice.
Perfect.

Sooo... in other words, those "liberal / socialist" first-world nations out there are actually a lot safer than ours because they have more stable social structures?
 
Old 12-20-2012, 10:43 AM
 
Location: Portland, OR
9,855 posts, read 11,933,875 times
Reputation: 10028
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
Perfect.

Sooo... in other words, those "liberal / socialist" first-world nations out there are actually a lot safer than ours because they have more stable social structures?
Don't laugh, he's actually dead on about that. The US ranks about with China with respect to income and wealth distribution. No other First World Country looks like the U.S. with respect to the size and destitution of its underclasses.

H
 
Old 12-20-2012, 10:44 AM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,563 posts, read 4,263,400 times
Reputation: 2127
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
Perfect.

Sooo... in other words, those "liberal / socialist" first-world nations out there are actually a lot safer than ours because they have more stable social structures?
Zing!!!!

Don't you love it when they argue against themselves, just to hang on to their guns, or their hate, or their paranoia that makes life so much fun?

Damn commie countries, living better lives than us.
 
Old 12-20-2012, 10:45 AM
 
Location: Portland, OR
9,855 posts, read 11,933,875 times
Reputation: 10028
Quote:
Originally Posted by blacksmith76 View Post
No surprise there. It's just like their economic plan - do nothing.
Exactly. I was actually thinking that myself but there's only so much time and energy. Thanks.
 
Old 12-20-2012, 11:42 AM
 
1,090 posts, read 1,594,838 times
Reputation: 784
Quote:
Originally Posted by CincyIU29 View Post
For example, despite incredibly tough gun control laws, Chicago, particularly the poorer Southside has a very high rate of gun related homicides, compared to wealthy Southern suburbs with very high gun ownership rates, such as The Woodlands, TX or Mountain Brook, AL.
So, you're comparing the Southside of Chicago with two wealthy counties in the South to prove... what?
As far as the South is concerned, it's the most murderous area in the USA...

Last edited by italianuser; 12-20-2012 at 11:50 AM..
 
Old 12-20-2012, 10:47 PM
 
46,961 posts, read 25,998,208 times
Reputation: 29448
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader View Post
It did not deregulate guns. It confined their ownership to "reliable" people, Nazi supporters and those not opposed to the Nazis.
Compared to the 1928 version, it was a considerable deregulation, long guns in particular became much more available.

Making Moth's statement that "In 1938, Germany established gun control" remain BS. In reality, in 1938, Germany relaxed its gun laws.
 
Old 12-20-2012, 11:41 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,201,197 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by annika08 View Post
Japan has a very low crime rate to begin with.

Japan also has one of the highest suicide rates in the world.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:03 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top