Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-19-2012, 08:15 AM
 
1,229 posts, read 1,147,608 times
Reputation: 667

Advertisements

Bill ORiley, Charles Krauthammer, Joe Scarborough, several senators and more now all support more gun law. We are gong to lose and the hard core who want to die in the Alamo rather than give some on guns will make it worse than it has to be. I would rather keep my semi auto and have to have it registered than to not have it at all.

The NRA is not the giant it was thought to be. People are now calling the kings new cloths for what they are. The NRA represents about 1 percent of the population. Of that 1% many agree that semi autos need to be regulated more. The NRA had better get on track or its going to become irrelevent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-19-2012, 08:42 AM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,970,287 times
Reputation: 7315
You are correct. the NRA has little political power. Over 99% of its 2012 campaign contribution dollars went to losing candidates, and Bloomberg's PAC knocked out 4 NRA supported opponents in 7 tries. He put a pittance in this year, testing the water for 2014 and beyond.

In general elections in 2014 and beyond, a connection to this fringe group (which has just 1/30th the membership versus the quantity of 2012 US voters) will be a liability to be used as campaign fodder for the opposition, not an asset.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 08:49 AM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,452,677 times
Reputation: 4243
What conservatives would like to see are the ILLEGAL guns taken off the streets, but Liberals/Progressives cry about infringing rights when police try to do this. SOME control laws are needed, like maybe registering a high capacity magazine and such. Registering/banning these so called scary "assault weapons" won't do anything. If a gunman enters a "gun free" zone where nobody is armed, you can kill scores with a 6 mag shotgun, revolver or any handgun. Who's going to stop them from reloading? I can fire all 6 shots out of a semi-auto shotgun and reload pretty damn fast. It would only take 4 reloads to kill over 20 people and that can be done in minutes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top