Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: Currently I physically reside on the 3rd planet from the sun
2,220 posts, read 1,878,203 times
Reputation: 886
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball
personally i kind of have mixed feelings about the question. on one hand i know all the evidence to date and think it would be an absolute waste of time and tax payer money. on the other hand i'd get a sadistic bit of entertainment out of watching congress hold birtherism hearings. one big point that you have to remember jwm is that the birthers have never had a qualified expert. i could not foresee a congressional hearing going well for the birthers.
sorry my answer wasn't more conclusive but it is my honest opinion. but..... it's a moot point anyway. the congressional research services has already investigated:
Yes and they are backed by the US Constitution. That any record or statement must be treated as true, unless credible evidence to the contrary exists.
birthers have been unable to produce credible evidence that directly contradicts the State of Hawaii Department of Health's claims.
Quote:
The BS by partisan politicians complicit in keeping Obama's records shrouded is documented by Sheriff Arpaio.
You mean the same BS partisan polictics that protects YOUR records from landing in the hands of joe Schmoe. Obama's records are as shrouded as yours and mines. so keep on believing the hype of "hidden" records, when we, in REALITY know that privacy laws exist and you are asking that these laws be violated.
Do you think this should be investigated by a congressional committee?
i told you exactly what i think on the subject.
Quote:
.... nor a rebuttal from your link.
there was no statement to rebut.
Quote:
All you link states is the president is not legally required to produce a birth certificate.
that's the first part. then it goes into the legal/historical understanding of "natural born citizen" then finally addresses the foreign birth claims:
"With respect to requests to "evaluate" evidence of a foreign birth, it may be noted briefly that there appear to be no official documentary records, or copies of such records, which might be subject to such evaluation."
Well..............he was voted back in office for a unprecedented sixth term as Sheriff.
I think that by now it has been certified that the state of Arizona is legally insane.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
