Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Graham and McCain have no buisness interfering with Any...reasonable complaint-perspective with regards to this administration. Having caviar at the WH talking and chatting as though its some kind of a joke or something. This is clearly an "Alpha-Male issue.
Rand Paul and T Cruz well know what they are doing and....are smarter and more capable then both those guys regardless of their great contribution, they are not in the same league.
To make public a divisive opinion is entirely illogical and greatly dis-appointed in what would be a hasty act of expression without very serious attention to over all shaping in idea and general consequence.
Instead of standing down with respect for a perspective away from this ridiculous gov...they complain like little babies.
Even with a meeting with R Paul and at least a few days to examine idea and consequence, a complaint against this honorable effort would take very careful thought and be firstly private and managed re statement.
Very dis-appointed in this outcry....make no mistake the complaint cannot be anything but 'in the way....of something well expressed that has its fundamental initiative in getting in the way of a disastrous and ridiculous administration.
Way to go R Paul and T Cruz.....I slept great last night not all together because I agree or dis agree...but because there are 'real minds' over there who give a sht and know what they are doing. Thats the problem, half those guys should be in another business and have no business in leadership. Either they represent the people or they do not....so wheres the peoples huge objection that would warrant such a pointed claim..? They are therefore out of order and at the same time obliging with the late dinner host's deliberate and intentional, invasion of flow in gov operations.
Last edited by stargazzer; 03-07-2013 at 01:05 PM..
Now wouldn't that be a beech if Brennan was confirmed after all this hype?
If Brennan is confirmed, taxpayers should be highly peeved for lawmakers wasting their time and tax dollars on such foolishness.
Paul might be looking from the outside in with other GOP members.
Stay thirsty my republican friends, and keep on drinking that koolaid.
Paul already said he will support Brennan. Once he gets a clear answer about drone strikes on American soil and its done within the rights of the constitution!
Again, and idiot participating in a topic with no idea what its about.
There is a great conversation going on right now on Glenn Greenwald's twitter feed https://twitter.com/ggreenwald regarding the absurd assumption that Holder has answered Rand Paul's question.
In fact, he hasn't. He just gave examples of when he thought he could kill US citizens. That doesn't mean he told us "only" when he thinks he can kill US citizens.
Glenn Greenwald is a liberal constitutional lawyer but very much respected by libertarians/conservatives for his non-partisan, principled stand on civil liberties, and calling out Obama for his hypocrisy and law breaking.
He was a vocal supporter of illegal wiretapping, supporter of torture and rendition, and a clear liar about how many civilian deaths are being caused by these secret drone campaign.
It's a Prime A example of Obama and liberal hypocrisy that he's being rewarded for this behavior.
Last edited by padcrasher; 03-07-2013 at 01:05 PM..
Paul already said he will support Brennan. Once he gets a clear answer about drone strikes on American soil and its done within the rights of the constitution!
Again, and idiot participating in a topic with no idea what its about.
Rand Paul 2016
I guess the answer he got from McCain and Graham, "ridiculous" had too many syllables for Paul to comprehend, so Holder had to supply one he could understand.
I guess the answer he got from McCain and Graham, "ridiculous" had too many syllables for Paul to comprehend, so Holder had to supply one he could understand.
It's really odd you've chosen to defend Obama on this issue. I had a higher opinion of you than that. You sound like one of these right wingers who just reflexively defends whatever their side does because of tribal loyalty, rather than standing on principle. I guess you learn something every day. Liberals can be as hypocritical as right wingers. Which is even more shameful because at least you have the smarts to know better.
It's really odd you've chosen to defend Obama on this issue. I had a higher opinion of you than that. You sound like one of these right wingers who just reflexively defends whatever their side does because of tribal loyalty, rather than standing on principle. I guess you learn something every day. Liberals can be as hypocritical as right wingers. Which is even more shameful because at least you have the smarts to know better.
Not defending Obama but am defending the use of tools used to affect the destruction of terrorists. Plus, making fun of Paul who is making fun of the GOP, is fun ...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Rand Paul filibustering Brennan's nomination as CIA Director
