Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-06-2013, 10:02 PM
 
5,261 posts, read 4,156,738 times
Reputation: 2264

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
Who said anyone owed you a higher wage?
I will accept this line of reasoning the day American CEOs are hired on a "free market."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-06-2013, 10:07 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,297,969 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometclear View Post
Yes, but it's not really the rich who form their base, it lower-middle class whites. That's primarily who posts that type of nonsense on this forum at all hours of the day. By definition, they have to be self-loathing, given that they believe:

1. If you work hard enough, you can be wealthy.
2. They are not wealthy.
3. Thus, they just haven't worked hard enough.

This is why they love to bash the poor. They can say, "Hey, at least I'm not as bad as those lazy SOBs over there!" And, of course, there are the yokels who get duped into the, "The queers are coming, the queers are coming! Planned Parenthood is taking your money to pay for abortions! The coloreds are coming for your white women!"

If someone has a better explanation for this phenomenon with lower middle-class whites, I'm all ears.
Well, this is where I'll give lower middle class whites some slack. Given the history of this nation. Given the society they were born into. Given the changing nature of the economic health of many lower middle class white men. Given the crappy schools, the fading industries, etc and so that many lower middle class whites experience, it not surprising that they see their relative decline as the result of the rise of those people.

Especially when you have very rich conservatives stoking those old ideas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2013, 10:07 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
9,701 posts, read 5,113,905 times
Reputation: 4270
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
Who said anyone owed you a higher wage?
This is exactly my point. This is what Republicans believe and it leads to policies that undermine attempts to create upward pressure on wages.

Why are you complaining about the unemployment rate, dwindling wages, and the lost jobs when you support businesses doing all the things that lead to them?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2013, 10:14 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
9,701 posts, read 5,113,905 times
Reputation: 4270
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometclear View Post
Yes, but it's not really the rich who form their base, it lower-middle class whites. That's primarily who posts that type of nonsense on this forum at all hours of the day. By definition, they have to be self-loathing, given that they believe:

1. If you work hard enough, you can be wealthy.
2. They are not wealthy.
3. Thus, they just haven't worked hard enough.

This is why they love to bash the poor. They can say, "Hey, at least I'm not as bad as those lazy SOBs over there!" And, of course, there are the yokels who get duped into the, "The queers are coming, the queers are coming! Planned Parenthood is taking your money to pay for abortions! The coloreds are coming for your white women!"

If someone has a better explanation for this phenomenon with lower middle-class whites, I'm all ears.
And Republican ideology has also trained them to believe that any question about their situation is not being a good Republican. How else do you get people who lost their job through outsourcing to vote for a guy who voted to let your company outsource your job.

And to make them feel like they got something out of deal, after losing their job, Republican establishment "fights" for their right to keep their guns and stop the gays from corrupting the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2013, 10:30 PM
 
51 posts, read 144,471 times
Reputation: 91
Wow, you are so confused. You need to read more. I have one word for you and it's call entitlements. You want to know why the U.S is in such bad shape, it's because we don't spend tax dollars on anything useful. Left wing looney tunes are constantly creating stupid laws that hurt businesses and don't give people the incentive to work.

You are correct about the outsourcing though. What a disgrace, the U.S is slowly dying.

The question that you asked is very complicated and to be honest I don't feel like writing an essay. Both the right and the left do a lot of things to hurt this country, it's not just Republicans. There is a cold civil war going on in this country and it's being fought by two morons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2013, 10:39 PM
 
Location: Columbus, OH
3,038 posts, read 2,514,238 times
Reputation: 831
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometclear View Post
Please cite a country that has removed such regulations on the economy and real wages have risen for workers.
According to United States Census data real wages for manufacturing rose 50% from 1865-1890 and another 34% from 1891-1914.

This was before the government had all these silly workplace laws. Before unions had any power or signifcant membership.

You'll also find child labor was dropping rapidly and workers hours leveled out at about 40 hours a week.

FDR and the Unions fixed all these problems in the 1930s. You know, a couple decades after capitalism solved them. lols.

And millions of unionized workers in Western Europe left for the non-union U.S.

Most progressive and big govt/union types deal with this reality by ignoring it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2013, 10:43 PM
 
Location: Columbus, OH
3,038 posts, read 2,514,238 times
Reputation: 831
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometclear View Post

1. If you work hard enough, you can be wealthy.
2. They are not wealthy.
3. Thus, they just haven't worked hard enough.
Yes, it's much easier to get rich by not working hard.

Who said everyone wants to get wealthy anyhow? No one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2013, 11:00 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,861 posts, read 24,115,793 times
Reputation: 15135
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieB.Good View Post
Conservatives "complain" about the economy under Obama -- the stagnating wages, the lack of jobs, etc -- but in reality, they are perfectly okay w/ the way things things are. They have to be since this is the outcome that is supposed to happen w/ the policies Republicans support. How is this economy NOT the scenario we end up w/ when businesses have the support of Republicans to outsource jobs, import cheaper employees, strip collective bargaining power from workers, and give the rich every incentive to keep as much money as they can?
That's odd. I thought you wanted to have an honest conversation, sans any games.

Perhaps you should perform some introspection prior to resuming this discussion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2013, 11:25 PM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,464,526 times
Reputation: 3142
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieB.Good View Post
Uh huh... it never fails. When the Conservative or Libertarian agenda is accurately pegged in an unflattering light it becomes "you don't know a thing about [blah]. "
Your post was a strawman, Eddie. Of course you tore it to shreds. You made it up in the first place. Duh. That's how stawmen work. You make up an argument, attribute it to your opponents, and then tear it down.

You haven't "accurately pegged the conservative agenda in an unflattering light" when you haven't accurately pegged the agenda in the first place. What you pegged in an unflattering light was a strawman, not the conservative libertarian agenda.

Quote:
And then there's usually an attempt to distance yourself from the policy by calling yourself something like a constitutional conservative, or musket & breeches Republican, or some other hackneyed term. All that space spent telling me I don't understand Conservatism, and yet nothing about where I'm wrong...
Why should I argue against a strawman? It's not my job to argue in favor of a position I never held to begin with.

Quote:
There's even a question in my OP dealing w/ your inevitable crying:
No, there isn't. There's a question in your original post asking Republicans to prove that Republican policies exert an upward pressure on wages. Don't try to mischaracterize it now. I read your original post.

I even pointed you to two conservative economic philosophers. If I was just crying at how you'd accurately pegged my agenda as unflattering, then I wouldn't have done that. If you were indeed accurate, then pointing you to source material would only reinforce your accuracy.

It's funny how in a thread you titled being being honest and not playing games you're more interested in gloating about how right you are than in actually finding out what the conservative agenda is from an actual conservative himself. Your true colors are showing. Honesty would be asking me what my agenda is, not insisting you pegged it accurately even after I said you didn't. You're trying to be right, not true and honest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2013, 11:43 PM
 
3,740 posts, read 3,071,820 times
Reputation: 895
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieB.Good View Post
Conservatives "complain" about the economy under Obama -- the stagnating wages, the lack of jobs, etc -- but in reality, they are perfectly okay w/ the way things things are. They have to be since this is the outcome that is supposed to happen w/ the policies Republicans support. How is this economy NOT the scenario we end up w/ when businesses have the support of Republicans to outsource jobs, import cheaper employees, strip collective bargaining power from workers, and give the rich every incentive to keep as much money as they can?

Take any problem that's wrong w/ the economy and ask yourself: what's the Republican solution to fix it?

Barely livable wages for the working poor? Cut taxes for the rich, cut welfare, repeal min wage.
Stagnating wages for the middle class? Cut taxes for the rich, cut benefits that help their kids go to college
Dwindling job openings? Cut taxes for the rich, cut gov't spending on public jobs so that there's not competition w/ private wages.
Overworked employees earning less of a share of profits? Cut taxes on the rich, push for "right to work" status.
Unqualified applicants for technical jobs? Cut taxes for the rich, bring in cheaper applicants from overseas.

I would be interested to know of any positions on the Right that put UPWARD pressure on wages... We already know what the current trend of downward pressure leads to: more people fighting for fewer jobs at lower wages creating less demand in the economy. So what do the Republicans have in their wheel house that puts the upward pressure on wages?

If Republicans think I'm full of bs, fine. But I'd like to hear which problem w/ the economy that you think the Republican solution fixes, and how it will end w/ upward pressure on wages.
You, or rather your post, is a perfect example of what Reagan spoke about when he said, in effect that it isn't what people don't know that is the problem, but what they think they know, that isn't true.

Your post is the embodiment, par excellance` of that phenomenon.

You would have made a lot more sense with a post that read

" ".

JFK said a rising tide lifts all boats.

The government consumes too much, and it isn't coming form the middle to lower end, where effective tax rates are zero or lower, but from the upper class who pay a grossly-dispropotionate share of the taxes.

All the things which you ascribe to Republicans (right to work, etc) are actually good for the employees of American companies. Note, I didn't call them "workers", because that is a nebulous, meaningless terms. Rather, they are employees of companies that use their services (labor) to make a profit, and for no other purpose. The employee's potential success is related, joined at the hip, with the companies potential success. Help the company to succeed, and you help the employee to succeed. Hinder the company, hinder the employee.

If the supply of labor compared to demand, is so high as to drive supply-and-demand driven wages, down, employees need to do the same thing that companies have to do when the supply of the product they sell is so high that prices fall.

Adapt. Grow diffent crops, stop manufacturing buggy-whips, and start making car-interior's etc. Those that refuse, well your fate is your own and of your own making.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top