How does throwing the poor out onto the streets, actually help them? (cost, money)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
some people here on CD seem to think that displacing the poor actually helps them.
someone needs to explain how this is so.
for example, we knock down a load of low income housing, replace it with high end apartments, and miraculously the poor benefit?
I mean, WTF!
so, the rich yuppies move in whilst the original residents are left in a slum somewhere on the edge of town, or maybe sleeping in a tent in the local park.
some people here on CD seem to think that displacing the poor actually helps them.
someone needs to explain how this is so.
No we don't. You work 14 hours a day and live in a hut (by your own admission). Since you have so much time to start so many dumb-ass threads, go Google something. Research is your friend.
No we don't. You work 14 hours a day and live in a hut (by your own admission). Since you have so much time to start so many dumb-ass threads, go Google something. Research is your friend.
I"m sure plenty have jobs - and why make it even harder for them to look for work by shoving them out into the suburbs - or is it more a case of 'out of sight, out of mind'?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.