Polls Show Plunging Public Support for New Gun Laws, Some Anti-Gun Politicians Can’t Backpedal Quickly Enough

[Quick Enough]

Originally Posted by dsjj251

I honestly do not understand why conservatives think that enacting something that had already been in place just 9 years earlier is in any way taking away your rights. The Supreme Court has already ruled that it doesnt.

Democrats were not using this to their advantage, they saw a dangerous situation and sought a solution that would protect the citizens of this nation.

are you actually arguing that democrats want to take your guns away for the hell of it ? How would that help democrats ?

Please explain how calling rifles that are NOT assailant weapons, assault weapons is going to do any good?

Please explain why the big to do about rifles, when NO rifles were used ?

Please explain how ANY of the new laws the anti-gunners have proposed would have affected the outcome at Sandy Hook.

I don't think you know much about what really went on, or much about guns.

[Quick Enough]

Originally Posted by ellemint

A study published in the Injury Prevention Journal, based on a 2004 National Firearms Survey, found that 20% of the gun owners with the most firearms possessed about 65% of the nation's guns. This could account for the rise in the number of gun checks---a concentration of gun owners who buy multiple guns.



Analysis: Fewer U.S. gun owners own more guns - CNN.com

Please post for us any instance that CNN has aired about a gun used in self defense.

Keep in mind they air when a gun is used illegally ALL the time.

[Rick Roma]

Originally Posted by Quick Enough

Please post for us any instance that CNN has aired about a gun used in self defense.

Keep in mind they air when a gun is used illegally ALL the time.

Well, to be fair CNN had extensive coverage when George Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin in self defense.

[Quick Enough]

Originally Posted by Rick Roma

Well, to be fair CNN had extensive coverage when George Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin in self defense.

Have you seen the 2 pictures of Martin?

The media, CNN included kept showing his picture when he was 12 YEARS OLD.

The way he looks NOW is FAR different. 6'2' 175 lbs, tattoos etc.

Why do you think they ONLY aired the picture from when he was 12?

[rw47]

Originally Posted by dsjj251

Wow, thats how you look at the deaths at newtown ?

What a dumb thing to say. Sarcasm?

[Rick Roma]

Originally Posted by Quick Enough

Have you seen the 2 pictures of Martin?

The media, CNN included kept showing his picture when he was 12 YEARS OLD.

The way he looks NOW is FAR different. 6'2' 175 lbs, tattoos etc.

Why do you think they ONLY aired the picture from when he was 12?

Are you familiar with the concept of sarcasm?

[Nomander]

Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow

2014 is going to be a bad year for a lot of mindless Democrats, people aren't going to forget you attempting to eliminate their rights.

Yes the will, unfortunately.

[Quick Enough]

Originally Posted by Rick Roma

Are you familiar with the concept of sarcasm?

Yes I do and I know you were being sarcastic, I know from reading many of your posts your stand on things but, I just wanted to get the point out about the biased agenda driven media.

[Jeerleader]

Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv

Our constitutional right to semi-automatic weapons?

Cripes, even Justice Scalia doesn't agree with any of you.

Howdja come up with that?

Following 140 years+ of SCOTUS opinion on the right to arms and the 2nd Amendment (two separate, distinct things) if there is any single type of arm that enjoys near absolute protection for civilian possession and use, it is those semi-auto, medium power, detachable mag arms commonly refereed to as "assault weapons".