Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-11-2013, 10:20 AM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,783,616 times
Reputation: 4174

Advertisements

If there's no Hillary, there's less outrage from the right


It's always a hoot to see the usual leftist fanatics making up falsehoods like this out of thin air, announcing that Republicans believe them, and then bashing those Republicans for them.

This kind of mental masturbation is becoming more and mor common among liberals, as they lose argument after argument and find their agenda unsupportable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-11-2013, 10:22 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,972 posts, read 22,151,621 times
Reputation: 13801
Quote:
Originally Posted by totsuka View Post
Hillary and Obama made this a political issue as soon as they heard the embassy was under attack by Muslim terrorists.
Their reactions went something like this

0bama: Oh noes! An al Qaeda linked terrorist group attacked the US on 9/11!!!!! I've been campaigning on 'al Qaeda is on the run' for months now, what will we do?

Hilary: Here's a paper bag, breath....breath.... We can claim it was an attack from an angry mob of video protesters, this way it cannot come back on you, since there is no way you could have prepared for that, nor can you control people making their own YouTube videos...
not yet anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2013, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,972 posts, read 22,151,621 times
Reputation: 13801
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
It seems like a simple question right? If the liberals in here claim that we are wrongly blaming Hillary for political reasons fine, who should we be blaming for this failure? Hillary Clinton is the sec of state, who should be responsible for this failure and apparent coverup?
Obviously it's someone higher up the chain of command then Hilary, hmmm.... who could that be? Such a paradox the Democrats find themselves in
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2013, 10:31 AM
 
Location: On Top
12,373 posts, read 13,194,417 times
Reputation: 4027
Quote:
Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv View Post
That's the way I see it. There needs to be a thorough investigation, but it will never happen that way. The right has politicized the issue to the point that the potential investigation's integrity has been destroyed. Now, surprise surprise, here comes Rand Paul....

Rand Paul challenges Hillary Clinton in key Iowa speech - NBC Politics
Hillary will be around to pissoff the righties for a long time to come!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2013, 10:48 AM
 
Location: Too far from home.
8,732 posts, read 6,782,122 times
Reputation: 2374
Quote:
Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv View Post
That's the way I see it. There needs to be a thorough investigation, but it will never happen that way. The right has politicized the issue to the point that the potential investigation's integrity has been destroyed. Now, surprise surprise, here comes Rand Paul....

Rand Paul challenges Hillary Clinton in key Iowa speech - NBC Politics
Nice. He blames Mitt for his party's identity crisis. And he wants to reach out to people that aren't like "them" (republicans). How kind of him.

He does have an advantage over any opponent. His hair(piece?). It's absolutely hideous and a serious distraction. I mean, you look at it and have to ask yourself: "WTF is that on his head?" and watch to see if it moves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2013, 10:52 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,558 posts, read 17,227,205 times
Reputation: 17597
Sad to think anyone who would vote for Hillary would overlook her lie about being under sniper fire and her 'what does it matter' comment in front of the benghazi families.

Let's see how she fares in the latest Benghazi hearings, she was so absent from the action in which her dept is embroiled. A note taken from Obama's teflon strategy.

Let's not forget Vince Foster and Whitewater.

Hillary has accomplished nothing except stay out of trouble.

So you want to be part of another historic election....can't differentiate betweena presidential election and 'dancing with the stars' auddience voting?

So sell the country down the tubes by choosing to ignore her unethical behavior which is trumped by her lack of accompolishments, keep Pete rose out of the hall of fame and dump on Lance Armstrong but by all means elect Hillary.

If Hillary was so revered, why did you choose to not believe her campaign claims about Obama. Now suddenly she is qualified enough to be pres?

Hillary 2016 is a subject raised by dems and politicized by dems. It just so happens her state dept is in the middle of a bad smelling coverup from which she cannot be extricated. Any future impact is incdental to her past actions or inactions.

For obama's reelection the reps were racist...once elected the dems looked to 2016 and running Hillary so now the reps are sexist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2013, 10:55 AM
 
1,635 posts, read 1,593,822 times
Reputation: 707
Quote:
Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv View Post
That's the way I see it. There needs to be a thorough investigation, but it will never happen that way. The right has politicized the issue to the point that the potential investigation's integrity has been destroyed. Now, surprise surprise, here comes Rand Paul....

Rand Paul challenges Hillary Clinton in key Iowa speech - NBC Politics
The media and the left's lack of integrity are the problem. This is a mega story but has been whitewashed. Leave your extreme partisanship at the door for once and be a patriot. Put country first,which I know is hard for the left.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2013, 10:59 AM
 
Location: Beautiful Niagara Falls ON.
10,016 posts, read 12,578,968 times
Reputation: 9030
The RWNJs are once again proving what a useless, brainless and disgusting bunch of idiots they are by persuing this non story.

In the congress they are worse than useless, do nothing, know nothing and can only impede everything possible to disrupt.

What a bunch of complete hosers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2013, 11:03 AM
 
15,531 posts, read 10,501,555 times
Reputation: 15812
Quote:
Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv View Post
That's the way I see it. There needs to be a thorough investigation, but it will never happen that way. The right has politicized the issue to the point that the potential investigation's integrity has been destroyed. Now, surprise surprise, here comes Rand Paul....

Rand Paul challenges Hillary Clinton in key Iowa speech - NBC Politics

Least we not forget: Daily Kos: Hillbilly Hard

Now that the democrats have decided to wuv Hillary again, I'm surpriised this hasn't been scrubbed. Sure, there's no love lost between the Clinton's and the Republicans. However, in 2008 her own party did her in (she was the racist hillbilly).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2013, 11:50 AM
 
Location: Texas State Fair
8,560 posts, read 11,214,794 times
Reputation: 4258
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
Your opinion is just that, yours.
And everyone's electoral predictions are just that...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top