Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-31-2013, 07:20 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,732,843 times
Reputation: 9325

Advertisements

And still have not recovered.

From the peak of the boom to the bottom of the bust, households watched a total of $16 trillion in wealth disappear amid sinking stock prices and the rubble of the real estate market. Since then, Americans have only been able to recapture 45 percent of that amount on average, after adjusting for inflation and population growth, according to the report from the St. Louis Fed released Thursday.

Americans have rebuilt less than half of wealth lost to the recession, study says - The Washington Post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-31-2013, 07:22 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,724,200 times
Reputation: 14745
I know some of y'all think you're the center of the universe, but where do you see "Baby Boomers" mentioned in that article?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 07:24 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,765,227 times
Reputation: 24863
My investments lost very little and have recovered very well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 07:26 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,732,843 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
I know some of y'all think you're the center of the universe, but where do you see "Baby Boomers" mentioned in that article?
Baby Boomers are Americans. They probably owned a disproportionate share of the wealth and the wealth lost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 07:27 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,732,843 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
My investments lost very little and have recovered very well.

Good for you. But we're talking about the total picture, not individuals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 07:27 AM
 
1,963 posts, read 1,822,287 times
Reputation: 844
Those who didnt get scared and sell off should have recovered fully, and then some, by now.

I'm up about 30% from mid 2008.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 07:28 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,724,200 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
Baby Boomers are Americans.
Well, there are Canadian and Australian baby boomers.

Quote:
They probably owned a disproportionate share of the wealth and the wealth lost.
Probably, yes. But "probably" isn't a very strong position to be taking, is it?

I'd argue that the decline in wealth has occured mostly among the Gen Y and Gen X. Gen Y has a ton of individuals with negative wealth from (A) Student loans and (B) Awful labor market. Gen X has negative wealth from underwater housing.

Boomers, by contrast, may own the majority of housing markets, but they also own the majority of stock markets too. As a % of their personal assets they are more heavily invested in the stock markets, which has obviously performed well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 07:30 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,732,843 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post


Probably, yes. But "probably" isn't a very strong position to be taking, is it?
Yes, it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 07:33 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,732,843 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by k.smith904 View Post
Those who didnt get scared and sell off should have recovered fully, and then some, by now.

I'm up about 30% from mid 2008.
I'm doing fine too, but that's because I could sit tight and wait. Many people could not since they needed the money for retirement, etc.

From the link;

The report found that the most fragile households were not well educated, relatively young or black or Hispanic, or some combination of those characteristics. Those families tended to have low savings combined with high debt and accrued much of their wealth through housing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 07:34 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,724,200 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
Yes, it is.
Probably not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top