Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-19-2013, 02:49 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,452,677 times
Reputation: 4243

Advertisements

I bet Bloomberg will hate this. There goes his "stop and frisk".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2013, 02:50 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,005,733 times
Reputation: 5455
Well you wouldn't want to offend anybody. The smart criminals will have some gym shorts under their jeans and just walk right on by the SWAT teams surrounding the bank that was just robbed. lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 02:51 PM
 
4,837 posts, read 4,167,640 times
Reputation: 1848
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
I bet Bloomberg will hate this. There goes his "stop and frisk".
Obviously, you didn't bother to read the article.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 03:09 PM
 
7,006 posts, read 6,994,198 times
Reputation: 7060
More Libnutter b.s. from that Bloomberg fascist? How in the world are cops supposed to do their job if they not allowed to describe what they see?

Quote:
Originally Posted by All American NYC View Post
Officer: “Can you tell me about the person who assaulted you?”

Victim: “Um, he, I mean it.......(sigh)….. human....I mean criminal guy.”
When news stations report on criminal activity in the neighborhood the accompanying photo of the alleged suspect will look like this-



Feel safer?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 03:12 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,123,773 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by northnut View Post
How you go from police profiling to police not being able to use descriptions when questioning a victim of a crime is beyond me. The bill is clearly against profiling. You DO know what profiling is, right? You know, when cops pull over say blacks simply because their black?
I disagree. If a person is black, then they're black. That's not profiling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 03:16 PM
 
4,837 posts, read 4,167,640 times
Reputation: 1848
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
I disagree. If a person is black, then they're black. That's not profiling.
I suggest you read the details about this introduction because NONE of you are getting it right. Reading, it's fundamental.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 03:19 PM
 
4,837 posts, read 4,167,640 times
Reputation: 1848
Here, for the folks who don't know how to use google.
About the Community Safety Act | Communities United for Police Reform
Legislative Hearing for Community Safety Act | Center for Constitutional Rights

And finally Aero, for your information:
To be clear: Intro. 800 would permit the NYPD to use race, ethnicity, religion, and other protected categories in its law enforcement activities, but it would limit the use of such information to situations that involve trustworthy information that is relevant to the locality and timeframe of alleged illegal activity. For example, if police officers receive a call that a white man who looks six feet tall and weighs about 200 pounds committed a crime on the morning of October 10th in the vicinity of City Hall, then of course police officers would be able to look for a white man who fits the profile. What the NYPD will be prohibited from doing, however, is to stop every white man in New York City for the next two weeks because of this one suspect description.
Testimony Before the New York City Council in Support of the Community Safety Act | New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) - American Civil Liberties Union of New York State
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2013, 10:34 AM
 
9,240 posts, read 8,668,081 times
Reputation: 2225
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
I disagree. If a person is black, then they're black. That's not profiling.
If they choose to do this, why not eliminate gender, & race on gov. applications?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2013, 10:47 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,180,801 times
Reputation: 7875
After the whole IRS profiling, I thought the Cons were against profiling....guess that didn't last long.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2013, 11:14 AM
 
Location: Phoenix
2,171 posts, read 1,459,438 times
Reputation: 1322
so stupid!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top