Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
1. Why is Orly attempting to pursue this in California when the Higher Education Service Corporation (HESC) is a New York state agency.
2. What standing does she think that she has to sue based upon alleged fraud between Obama and this New York agency.
3. Since Obama had been enrolled as student in Hawaii from 5th grade through to his high school graduation, this series of facts escaped the HESC during his initial application.
In short, just when you thought the craziness was over... it starts all over again.
Oh, well there haven't been many things of with such amusement value around here lately, so bring it on.
Add on 4. HESC only gives financial aid to residents of the State of New York. President Obama has never been a resident of NY and his student loans were federal loans (not sure who the servicer or provider was). So why would HESC have *any* of his records? I think Orly's getting punk'd again.
Last edited by garnetpalmetto; 06-21-2013 at 12:00 PM..
Orly Taitz and her law office is based out of California and the lady works in Albany, New York. The lady has microfilm to confirm her evidence that Obama got financial aid as a foreign student.
Add on 4. HESC only gives financial aid to residents of the State of New York. President Obama has never been a resident of NY and his student loans were federal loans (not sure who the servicer or provider was). So why would HESC have *any* of his records? I think Orly's getting punk'd again.
But, but, but.. somebody handed Orly a handwritten note so it must be true.
1. Why is Orly attempting to pursue this in California when the Higher Education Service Corporation (HESC) is a New York state agency.
Oh, that one is not quite as crazy as the rest. She's using this fantastic new evidence to argue in favor of her appeal in the case she lost against Occidental University being granted. In other words, she's trying to undo a case that she already lost in California.
Oh, that one is not quite as crazy as the rest. She's using this fantastic new evidence to argue in favor of her appeal in the case she lost against Occidental University being granted. In other words, she's trying to undo a case that she already lost in California.
Hey she would have won that if only Obama didn't spend millions of dollars sealing all of his records. What a putz Obama is. All of my education records are sealed and I didn't have to pay a single dime to do it!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
