Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa
Yes. The Martins would probably do better to hire someone to mete out a little "frontier justice" than try their case in Florida where the law protects racists who grab a gun and go out and harass black kids.
|
So, let me get this straight.
GZ follows TM through the community because this kid is walking casually through the subdivision,
in the rain, staring into the windows of every house he passes.
GZ exercises poor/overzealous judgment, ignores police dispatcher, and leaves his vehicle. Meanwhile, he's lost sight of TM.
TM arrives out of nowhere and punches GZ in the nose (breaking it) for following him.
GZ falls to the ground.
TM straddles GZ, punching him, and further - continually bashes GZ's head into the concrete.
GZ in fear for his life, somehow is able to pull his gun and shoot TM.
So, TM - who threw the first punch, broke GZ's nose, bashes GZ's head into concrete - is the innocent?
And, GZ - who would have surely been killed - should serve 30 years on a manslaughter charge for defending himself?
******
What gave Travon the right to punch GZ?
What gave Travon the right to bash GZ's head into the ground?
At no time was GZ physically aggressive toward GM.
*****
Yes, GZ exhibited poor judgment in leaving his vehicle. But, that is
all he did.
TM is the real killer, here. And would surely have been if GZ hadn't killed him first. I'd say it's a darn good thing GZ had his gun.
Otherwise, it would be Travon charged and
convicted for 2nd degree murder.
Generally, people die as they lived. I would call this frontier justice.
We'll see how GZ's life unfolds going forward.