Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-31-2014, 12:47 PM
 
7,006 posts, read 6,995,315 times
Reputation: 7060

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justme305 View Post
I haven't read the article, but I think it's stupid for anyone to imply that the jury found Zimmerman not guilty only because they were simply following what the law instructs them to do and that "in their hearts" they felt he was guilty. Please! If the prosecution had an actual case against Zimmerman showing that he was indeed guilty of "profiling" and of "racism" and of "murder with intent" then the jury would have unquestionably convicted him. Instead, the prosectuion thought they could prey on the jury's emotions in order to convict Zimmerman.
This is exactly what they tried to do in the Casey Anthony case. The most hated woman in the world, Casey Anthony walked free because the prosecution didn't provide enough evidence to support a death sentence, and they were counting on her loathsomeness to convict her.

 
Old 10-31-2014, 02:48 PM
 
Location: St Paul
7,713 posts, read 4,749,163 times
Reputation: 5007
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwkilgore View Post
Reading the article, I'm reminded of a thought I had a while back. That maybe the prosecutor intentionally set the bar too high. He knew all the evidence pointed to self defense (Martin was bigger and stronger than Zimmerman; Martin was pissed off at the world with multiple suspensions while Z was just trying to protect his neighborhood; Martin was racist ["creepy *ss cracker"] while all evidence said Z was not; Z spent the time on the phone with the police telling them what he was doing and why; and according to *both* witnesses [Janteal and Z] Martin attacked first), but massive political pressure forced him to press charges or lose his job.

But in a smart move, instead of presenting a case he had a chance of winning (manslaughter, or maybe negligent homicide), he shot the moon with a losing hand. Afterwards he could say to the media, "I did what you demanded", knowing he never had a chance of winning.
Didn't the original prosecutor get pulled from the case & replaced by a 'special prosecutor'? Lot's of crazy conspiracy stuff from the left (in addition to the outright lies). Police were racists. Prosecutor was racist. Special prosecutor intentionally lost the case. Z caused his own head injuries. There were no head injuries. Witnesses for Z were all liars. Lie detectors aren't accurate. etc.
 
Old 10-31-2014, 10:15 PM
 
13,303 posts, read 7,872,015 times
Reputation: 2144
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBen View Post
Jimmy Carter: George Zimmerman jury

Finally a voice of reason. The Law stinks the way it is written but he understands the Jury had to come up with the verdict they did.
Jurors are not officers of the court.

It's sad that so many people think that they are.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:24 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top