Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-29-2013, 03:27 PM
 
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,082,780 times
Reputation: 3937

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bumpus7 View Post
.
Senders of texts to drivers can be held liable, court rules


Maybe they should think more than twice.

Yahoo!
.
Yeah...we'll see how well THAT flies in the long run...bets anyone?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-29-2013, 03:49 PM
 
Location: USA
13,255 posts, read 12,129,807 times
Reputation: 4228
They must need more money.

One of the most bogus laws I've ever heard of.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2013, 09:08 PM
 
Location: California
37,135 posts, read 42,222,200 times
Reputation: 35014
Can't wait to see this applied. What a riot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2013, 04:39 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,210,872 times
Reputation: 17209
If you read the actual article it notes that the bar here is set very high. If you think that through that would rule out a text that was never read, that was sent if you were not aware they were driving.

I don't suppose the law is as dumb as someone who continues to text with someone that they know is driving.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2013, 06:25 AM
 
11,411 posts, read 7,809,020 times
Reputation: 21923
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombocom View Post
A text like "i'm driving to the supermarket, need anything?" would probably be a pretty good give away.
But no one says that. They'd say "I'm going to the supermarket, need anything?". I never mention my transportation method when I send a text even if I'm in route to somewhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2013, 06:37 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
16,911 posts, read 10,594,283 times
Reputation: 16439
It is actually not that novel. Basic tort law says that you can be held negligent if you knew or should have known that your actions could cause harm to another. If you know a person is driving and text them, you know that reading it is dangerous. I agree it would still be hard to prove. I would that you need to prove both that you knew the person was driving and that you knew the person would read the text message while they were driving. Just because you send a text doesn't mean the person will necessarily read it right away. And I didn't read the whole case but I'm sure contributory negligence will come into play in most of these cases.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2013, 06:43 AM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,671,534 times
Reputation: 9174
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNC4Me View Post
Precisely how would they prove you "knew" you were texting someone who was driving? And even of you did know, the burden of responsibility IMO, still rests with the recipient of the text.
Exactly.

It's the "blame someone else" syndrome.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2013, 06:59 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,210,872 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
Exactly.

It's the "blame someone else" syndrome.
They are not blaming someone else. They are also blaming someone else. There is a huge difference when you insert that one word.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2013, 07:04 AM
 
Location: A great city, by a Great Lake!
15,896 posts, read 11,991,168 times
Reputation: 7502
Sigh... just more nanny state BS!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2013, 07:06 AM
 
Location: Too far from home.
8,732 posts, read 6,783,417 times
Reputation: 2374
Dumbing down of America. I bet America is about half way there. The second half should be real easy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top