Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-13-2013, 12:03 PM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,763,920 times
Reputation: 5691

Advertisements

I miss the days when the Irish and Italians ruled the working class. You crap on those guys and they'd bust a chair across your teeth. Now all the pitbulls are mainly in the capitalist class and crap on the workers constantly, and then have the brass to complain all day about the stench.

 
Old 09-13-2013, 12:04 PM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,054,479 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBen View Post
When Congress has the right to trade stocks with inside information while to the public that is a crime, you do the math.

They all are a sham.
Yet, the party that's "for the little guy" had total power for 2 years when obama was riding high and they did absolutely nothing about it!

Support guys like Rand Paul and Ted Cruz if you want REAL change.
 
Old 09-13-2013, 12:07 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
Interesting.

I don't see a single thing noted here that would make the income inequality gap attributable in any way to the President.

A question: if companies are not hiring, how exactly does an employee leverage his/herself in such a way to get that increase in pay?

If the job you have is the only job you can get, you're pretty much out of luck, huh?
Funny how you can attribute homelessness to the president, but not equate jobs, or a lack of jobs to one. Tell me, is it only Republican ones you can attribute problems to?
 
Old 09-13-2013, 12:11 PM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,054,479 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
did it ever occur to anyone that when you create a dependent class of people, IE the poor on welfare and food stamps, that the income gap is going to increase?
Don't forget bout the "dreamers" who were just thrust upon the already suffering economy.

Minimum wage level workers earning minimum wage but support the "immigration reform" are just what the dummycrats depend on to keep control over people.

"We want fairness!"

"We want tuition assistance!"

"We want good paying jobs!"

"We need food stamps!"

"We want free housing!"

"We want, we want, we want......"

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...............................:c rying:

Lefties are a disgusting waste of humanity. They do nothing but keep people in bondage.
 
Old 09-13-2013, 12:13 PM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,054,479 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
Interesting.

I don't see a single thing noted here that would make the income inequality gap attributable in any way to the President.

A question: if companies are not hiring, how exactly does an employee leverage his/herself in such a way to get that increase in pay?

If the job you have is the only job you can get, you're pretty much out of luck, huh?
Of course not.

If a republican were president, the recipient class and their leftie enablers would be on here whining all day every day about the economy.
 
Old 09-13-2013, 12:17 PM
 
20,462 posts, read 12,384,859 times
Reputation: 10259
Just some musings for those interested about policy

So we are told that democrats are for the little guy. They say we need to increase taxes on the "rich" they call the rich, those who are making some 200K per year? Something like that?

Well any "income tax" isn’t going to impact the rich because the rich don’t get their money from "income".
The only people who get money from "income" as defined by the IRS are people who are emerging into the wealthy classes.

What this policy does is limit access to real wealth. It prevents middle class people from moving up. Real wealth is all about assets. It is NOT about income.

Limiting access to higher wealth strata is really about limiting access to POWER.

Liberal political ideology is all about amassing power into the hands of the political elite and shrinking the size of the power holders to a smaller group of people.


Now this is not what they SAY but that is the actual outcome of the policy. People need to start ignoring what they SAY and start looking at what the policy does.
 
Old 09-13-2013, 12:18 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,455,215 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
What unions? We are busy doing away with all those in our 'right to work' states. That's another thing that has hurt the middle class - like it or not.

The middle class hasn't had a voice since Bush I, II, and now III.

Our country will implode if this continues but I really see no relief in sight.
I juyst live how you leave Clinton out of the mix when he was responsible for more damage to the middle class of this country and the upper making more money than any other President in a long long time. Who do you think the Free Trade agreements helped and hurt? How about the repeal of Glass Steagall? The upper class benefits and the middle and lower classes suffer do to that.
 
Old 09-13-2013, 12:19 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,455,215 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
Just some musings for those interested about policy

So we are told that democrats are for the little guy. They say we need to increase taxes on the "rich" they call the rich, those who are making some 200K per year? Something like that?

Well any "income tax" isn’t going to impact the rich because the rich don’t get their money from "income".
The only people who get money from "income" as defined by the IRS are people who are emerging into the wealthy classes.

What this policy does is limit access to real wealth. It prevents middle class people from moving up. Real wealth is all about assets. It is NOT about income.

Limiting access to higher wealth strata is really about limiting access to POWER.

Liberal political ideology is all about amassing power into the hands of the political elite and shrinking the size of the power holders to a smaller group of people.


Now this is not what they SAY but that is the actual outcome of the policy. People need to start ignoring what they SAY and start looking at what the policy does.
Nailed it!
 
Old 09-13-2013, 12:21 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,455,215 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiddlehead View Post
I miss the days when the Irish and Italians ruled the working class. You crap on those guys and they'd bust a chair across your teeth. Now all the pitbulls are mainly in the capitalist class and crap on the workers constantly, and then have the brass to complain all day about the stench.
You mean the mafia right? LMAO!
 
Old 09-13-2013, 12:23 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,392,645 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
Just some musings for those interested about policy

So we are told that democrats are for the little guy. They say we need to increase taxes on the "rich" they call the rich, those who are making some 200K per year? Something like that?

Well any "income tax" isn’t going to impact the rich because the rich don’t get their money from "income".
The only people who get money from "income" as defined by the IRS are people who are emerging into the wealthy classes.

What this policy does is limit access to real wealth. It prevents middle class people from moving up. Real wealth is all about assets. It is NOT about income.

Limiting access to higher wealth strata is really about limiting access to POWER.

Liberal political ideology is all about amassing power into the hands of the political elite and shrinking the size of the power holders to a smaller group of people.


Now this is not what they SAY but that is the actual outcome of the policy. People need to start ignoring what they SAY and start looking at what the policy does.
The tax rate on capital gains should be increased.

We need to drastically cut government spending, but there are way to many people, making way more money then is beneficial for the economy on capital gains alone.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:43 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top