Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Personally, I would never spend that much on a bag. No way, no how. Even if I was a millionaire, not gonna happen. That's absurd. But whatever, if that's what she wants to do then that's her choice. I think it's stupid & wasteful but it's not illegal. Racial profiling however is despicable.
Racial profiling: Big problem. Spending $2500 on a purse? As long as she spent her own money on that, and not mine, none of our business.
She spent her tax return, which based on the evidence from the article (part time, low income job, one child and one on the way) seems to be EIC, so she did, in fact, spend my tax dollars on her $2500 purse.
The process of giving "refunds" for more than people paid should be ended immediately. It's absurd that people get back thousands more than they paid in.
She spent her tax return, which based on the evidence from the article (part time, low income job, one child and one on the way) seems to be EIC, so she did, in fact, spend my tax dollars on her $2500 purse.
The process of giving "refunds" for more than people paid should be ended immediately. It's absurd that people get back thousands more than they paid in.
Your tax dollars? Really? Tell me, how much did you contribute? Maybe 1/8 of a cent? TRAVESTY!!!! LOL.
My wife has quite a few expensive purses. Her newest is a Dior bag that cost over $4200. She has a closet full of bags with an average price of $2500-$3000 each.
I could care less what people spend their money on either. Hell, I've bought my wife a 4 figure Louis V bag. But, I can afford it.
And I'm willing to bet my paycheck, that this girl doesn't have $2500 saved, but she does have 1 kid, 1 on the way and apparently no husband.
I'm guessing she "can't" afford it.
She spent her tax return, which based on the evidence from the article (part time, low income job, one child and one on the way) seems to be EIC, so she did, in fact, spend my tax dollars on her $2500 purse.
The Earned Income Credit just reduces taxes on earned income. You don't get back more than you put in. So "in fact" anyone who reduces their taxes is spending "your" tax dollars. Why don't you go after high income earners who finds ways to reduce their taxes?
Her money, her discretion how and where to spend it. She could have bought a sofa or a cruise vacation and no one would make an issue of it, but maybe she felt she needed to treat herself to something special and new pricey handbag was it for her.
Yes, along with all rest of the 50% who pay federal taxes. Why is the government taking money from people to send back checks to others who didn't pay it in?
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw
The Earned Income Credit just reduces taxes on earned income. You don't get back more than you put in. So "in fact" anyone who reduces their taxes is spending "your" tax dollars. Why don't you go after high income earners who finds ways to reduce their taxes?
EIC is a refundable tax credit. Meaning you get the full refund, even if you didn't pay in that much in taxes. So you have two children, you qualify for $5200 in EIC (assuming you have earned income.)
If your taxes owed are $2,000, then the government sends you a check for $3,200. Free money that you never paid into the system. Money that they take from taxpayers like me. That's the money she used to buy her $2,500 purse.
what's the bigger issue: racial profiling or spending $2500 on a purse?
Let's see: is it your money?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.