Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-31-2013, 07:24 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,640,534 times
Reputation: 14806

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardA View Post
Well I'm covered by a group plan so I'm insulated from Obamacare until 2015 but seems to me paying the penalty is the way go for young people not covered by such a plan. Since you can get insurance with pre-existing condition you just buy it when you get sick. Am I missing something?
Sure, you just wait until you get really sick, and then you wait some more for the new policy to become effective and if you are still alive, you go to the hospital for treatment

Last edited by Finn_Jarber; 10-31-2013 at 08:09 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-31-2013, 07:25 AM
 
Location: State of Being
35,879 posts, read 77,506,170 times
Reputation: 22753
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones View Post
This has already been covered extensively. It is entirely your decision to purchase insurance or not.

Your penalty will be totally dependent to your individual circumstance...
While that is basically true . . . the penalty goes up. So during the first year, the penalty isn't that much of a hit for a single person.

But here is what has NOT been openly discussed. The penalty is based on a FORMULA - it is a not a flat fee. The FEE folks hear about simply means . . . you will pay at least that fee, and if the formula results in a HIGHER fee, then you will pay that amount.

And it isn't as though you get to "mail that penalty check into the IRS." Nope. The amount you owe for not buying insurance will be WITHHELD, by law, by the IRS. So if you are expecting a tax refund . . . whatever your fee is will be WITHHELD by the IRS.

So that could get quite expensive . . . especially to folks counting on a tax refund.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2013, 07:27 AM
 
Location: Wherever I happen to be at the moment
1,228 posts, read 1,369,815 times
Reputation: 1836
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardA View Post
Employer mandate doesn't kick in until for 2015.
Not the point. Sorry! So you're currently covered by your employer. At issue is the promise that your insurance won't be touched under those circumstances. The point is, given the other lies, do you really believe that? If so, let's talk bridges. Such a deal I have for you!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2013, 07:28 AM
 
Location: texas
9,127 posts, read 7,944,791 times
Reputation: 2385
Quote:
Originally Posted by anifani821 View Post
While that is basically true . . . the penalty goes up. So during the first year, the penalty isn't that much of a hit for a single person.

But here is what has NOT been openly discussed. The penalty is based on a FORMULA - it is a not a flat fee. The FEE folks hear about simply means . . . you will pay at least that fee, and if the formula results in a HIGHER fee, then you will pay that amount.

And it isn't as though you get to "mail that penalty check into the IRS." Nope. The amount you owe for not buying insurance will be WITHHELD, by law, by the IRS. So if you are expecting a tax refund . . . whatever your fee is will be WITHHELD by the IRS.

So that could get quite expensive . . . especially to folks counting on a tax refund.
Sorry that has been discussed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2013, 07:29 AM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,421,721 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Yes, you are. While one can get insurance if you have pre-existing conditions, you can't get insurance instantly or retroactively.

Also, while an insurance company may have to give you insurance, you may pay more if you have a pre-existing condition.
So basically say I go for my annual check up and something amiss is discovered and he gives me a referral to specialist. I simply sign up for insurance before my specialist visit.

The only flaw in this plan is what you cited, the event I'm a victim of some trauma. Since charity care is suspected to go down because of Obamacare the odds of a hospital picking up the tab are better than before. A chance many people would take.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2013, 07:30 AM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,421,721 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostly1 View Post
Not the point. Sorry! So you're currently covered by your employer. At issue is the promise that your insurance won't be touched under those circumstances. The point is, given the other lies, do you really believe that? If so, let's talk bridges. Such a deal I have for you!
Ok I said currently insulated, I'm sure Obamacare surprises abound related to employer mandate, hence the delay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2013, 07:31 AM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,556,977 times
Reputation: 3602
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones View Post
This has already been covered extensively. It is entirely your decision to purchase insurance or not.

Your penalty will be totally dependent to your individual circumstance...
You mean that if you make to much your "penalty" (I thought that the One said it was a tax) your "penalty" rises. Sort of like being forced into something you do not want or need.

Hey, I just defined Obamacare: something you don't want or need. At least from the government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2013, 07:33 AM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,421,721 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Sure, you just wait until you get really sick, and then you wait some more for the new policy to become effective and if you are still alive, you go to the hospital for treatment Good thinking. You must be a professional leech.
Why should I be forced to pay for old people? I want to save my money and build my future for me and my family.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2013, 07:33 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,884,155 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardA View Post
So basically say I go for my annual check up and something amiss is discovered and he gives me a referral to specialist. I simply sign up for insurance before my specialist visit.

The only flaw in this plan is what you cited, the event I'm a victim of some trauma. Since charity care is suspected to go down because of Obamacare the odds of a hospital picking up the tab are better than before. A chance many people would take.
Hospitals don't pick up the tab. The rest of us do. We pay higher prices for services, we pay higher premiums for insurance.

I thought you conservatives were all about personal accountability?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2013, 07:35 AM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,556,977 times
Reputation: 3602
Quote:
Originally Posted by anifani821 View Post
While that is basically true . . . the penalty goes up. So during the first year, the penalty isn't that much of a hit for a single person.

But here is what has NOT been openly discussed. The penalty is based on a FORMULA - it is a not a flat fee. The FEE folks hear about simply means . . . you will pay at least that fee, and if the formula results in a HIGHER fee, then you will pay that amount.

And it isn't as though you get to "mail that penalty check into the IRS." Nope. The amount you owe for not buying insurance will be WITHHELD, by law, by the IRS. So if you are expecting a tax refund . . . whatever your fee is will be WITHHELD by the IRS.

So that could get quite expensive . . . especially to folks counting on a tax refund.
Adjust your with holding on your pay check to the level where you would not be expecting a refund. What are they going to with hold then?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:38 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top