87 nations now have drones..US gets worried (enemies, Reagan, impeachment)

[Goinback2011]

All you leftists cheering this on should consider which US cities are likely to be terrorist targets.

[Watchman57]

This Drone Can Fly, Swim, Drive, and Hop Its Way Through a Mission | Danger Room | Wired.com

[michiganmoon]

Originally Posted by Harrier

Harrier has seen two drones fly directly over his head in the last 6 months.

Harrier is certain that President Obama didn't send the flying robots.

Our local "law enforcement" thugs are using them.

Do you support the burgeoning police state?

What are they saying? Potentially 30,000 drones over the USA within the next couple decades.

[michiganmoon]

Originally Posted by burdell

This is different than the "we can have nukes, you can't" mentality how?

This is different than the "we can invade other nations unprovoked, you can't" mentality how?

maybe it's time people learn the axis of our universe doesn't pass thru Washington DC.

I was really hoping that Obama would change this. Too bad he escalated these poor policies of GWBush.

With Obama we get...
...More drone bases
...Sending more drones
...Over more countries
...Violating more air space
...with more collateral damage

Most of the people most vocal against this policy under Bush are suddenly fine with it growing. Sad.

St. Pete for Peace

[Bily Lovec]

Originally Posted by MilehiDenver

"Aren't we the ones that set a precedent of bombing from drones with no concern ?"



No concern? Your so VERY wrong that it is pathetic! You have absolutely NO CLUE for the order it takes to give permission to release a weapon from a drone! Please refrain from a subject that you obviously have no clue about!

so all those sleeping women and children obama murdered wasnt an accident ?
barry intentionally slaughtered them ?

[Glitch]

Originally Posted by Goinback2011

All you leftists cheering this on should consider which US cities are likely to be terrorist targets.

Why do you think they are cheering this on? Leftists want US cities attacked. Nothing makes them happier than to see Americans die.

[burdell]

Originally Posted by Glitch

Why do you think they are cheering this on? Leftists want US cities attacked. Nothing makes them happier than to see Americans die.

Always nice to here what the RWNJs are cooking up in their overactive imaginations.

[Swingblade]

There will be a drone resolution from the U N lead by the hypocrites of the U S stating who can and can't have drones. And too get countries in compliance their will be sanctions and more reasons to feed the MIC.

I do not think it is so far fetched that a drone strike could take place in the U S, what goes around comes around.

[Swingblade]

Originally Posted by michiganmoon

I was really hoping that Obama would change this. Too bad he escalated these poor policies of GWBush.

With Obama we get...
...More drone bases
...Sending more drones
...Over more countries
...Violating more air space
...with more collateral damage

Most of the people most vocal against this policy under Bush are suddenly fine with it growing. Sad.

St. Pete for Peace

And if their guy is sitting in the big chair they will switch back and be in support. I notice the {D}s had no problem doing the exact same thing for Obama. Both parties and their mindless partisans are so alike.

[burdell]

Originally Posted by HappyTexan

The drone operators have zero chance of dying because they are stationed here in the US in a bunker in New Mexico while flying and dropping bombs in Yemen.

There's the difference. There is no fear of lose of life. Loss of military is no longer a concern.
Wouldn't that make decisions a little more brazen ? Wouldn't that make taking risks easier ?

I don't really feel I've seen much indication over the last 50 years that potential losses are a primary decision making point with the powers that decide where/when the military will be deployed in anger, Vietnam being a prime example.