Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why would natural selection then turn us into
one of the wimpiest species?
I'm not following. Wimpiest in what way? Every species has it's own strengths and weaknesses. We may not have a hard outer shell to live in, we don't have sharp claws and teeth, we don't run very fast and we can't survive under water.
What we DO have is a big brain. Big enough to invent gods and souls.
There is no difference between macro and micro except the scale involved. Same mechanisms
I suppose people who believe in the religious fiction of a Young Earth (instead of the reality of a 4 and half billion year old earth) might need to shut their mind to the overwhelming evidence to try to maintain their religious beliefs.
Sorry. but while microevolution has been observed(simple adaptation), macroevolution by definition can never be observed.
So stop talking nonsense.
A Young Earth is 'nonsense'. If a person starts with a nonsense premise like that, it's not surprising that they just dismiss the overwhelming evidence for evolution without even looking at it. It's too threatening to their religious beliefs.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
