Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
In Nazi Germany, the Jews held the spot as the top 10% in wealth and assets.(Obama has a full assault on the rich)
The Nazi took over the Church and religion of Germany. (Obama has full assault on religion)
The Nazi educated the children. No one else could. (Through the DOE, both Obama's have been rewriting history)
The Nazi used political power to intimidate the opposition.(IRS, NSA, ATF, CIA, FBI, DOJ, EPA, FDA and the whole host of government agencies placing the boot on the throats of the opposing voice)
Should I go on? The list is overwhelming.
It is not hard at all to compare tyrants. There is a reason they get that label.
we are definitely menaced into llimiting what we say.
even something we said 30 yeara ago can cost us our jobs. i am glad i post on cdf. been doing it since 2007 when i retired. all my opinion can cost me here is a 5 day vacation with pay.
You're right to free speech doesn't supersede someone else's same right. Freedom of speech is not freedom of social consequence if you say things that are evil, inflammatory or just plain nuts.
In Nazi Germany, the Jews held the spot as the top 10% in wealth and assets.(Obama has a full assault on the rich)
The Nazi took over the Church and religion of Germany. (Obama has full assault on religion)
The Nazi educated the children. No one else could. (Through the DOE, both Obama's have been rewriting history)
The Nazi used political power to intimidate the opposition.(IRS, NSA, ATF, CIA, FBI, DOJ, EPA, FDA and the whole host of government agencies placing the boot on the throats of the opposing voice)
Should I go on? The list is overwhelming.
It is not hard at all to compare tyrants. There is a reason they get that label.
I pray to Republican Jesus that the GOP repeats some of these points in the next convention
I saw several posters on this very forum saying the comments by Schultz and Bashir were vile and disgusting, but they shouldn't have been fired over them.
When the corporations that direct the narrative, through big time advertising money, were dumping the network over it, you bet they were not worth keeping. They were a liability to shareholders.
I don't know, could it perhaps be the recent IRS audit soon after getting national attention for his political views? Or the protests against his planned graduation speech at the university/hospital where he taught and was the head of pediatric neurosurgery because of espousing views that many people hold? I have no idea what type of mail he receives, but I don't imagine it's all positive just by reading comments about him here.
I'm curious, what does "SMH" mean? I've seen that on a few of your posts and Iamme's. Is it an abbreviation like "BTW"?
I've been audited before. Big deal. Maybe it was just his time
And if Hopkins kids didn't want him giving the commencement address, they have that right. It's THEIR day, not his.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
