Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-27-2014, 02:26 PM
 
Location: A great city, by a Great Lake!
15,896 posts, read 11,991,168 times
Reputation: 7502
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeyJude514 View Post
But, but, but...I thought the GOP was the party of "Small government!" "No more nanny state!" "Keep the government out of our lives!" Hmmm...

No that would be the Libertarian Party. Go down the hall, and it's the 3rd door on the right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-27-2014, 02:51 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,392,645 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by no1brownsfan View Post
No that would be the Libertarian Party. Go down the hall, and it's the 3rd door on the right.
AKA, where the party is
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2014, 03:01 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,226,860 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by tablemtn View Post
Land of the free? Not if you play online poker, at least if Senator Lindsey Graham and Rep. Jason Chaffetz gets their way:

Online gaming debate heats up again in Congress



Graham is apparently doing this out of raw corruption (he accepted contributions from land-based gaming interests), but Chaffetz's motivations are not as clear.

How do you feel about this proposal, if you consider yourself a Republican?
They want to tax it and if they can't, get rid of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2014, 03:47 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,009,955 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
The goals of the Graham-Chaffetz legislation are consistent with the highly publicized campaign by billionaire casino owner Sheldon Adelson to outlaw Internet gambling on moral grounds.

If I was allowed to answer I would have to wait until I stopped laughing so hard.
Pathetic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2014, 03:48 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,009,955 times
Reputation: 5455
Lindsey just got a 15K donation from this guy Adelson last year and he hadn't gotten any prior according to an article I just read about this. It appears he is looking for more as he us up in Nov. That is all these clowns care about..........they don't care about folks who enjoy online gambling. It is immoral........it appears........unless you go to a casino then it is perfectly fine. LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2014, 03:53 PM
 
Location: St Paul
7,713 posts, read 4,749,163 times
Reputation: 5007
Quote:
Originally Posted by aedubber View Post
I feel they should ban online poker for sure.. I rather go to a casino and have fun then sit on my ass on a computer and click a button. Also its good for the casinos which generate revenue for the cities it is in and employees people .
Since you personally would rather go to a brick 'n' mortar casino, you think millions of other Americans should be BANNED from doing something they enjoy? Yeah totalitarianism!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2014, 03:55 PM
 
Location: St Paul
7,713 posts, read 4,749,163 times
Reputation: 5007
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
They want to tax it and if they can't, get rid of it.
This has been going on for years. The offshores WANT to pay taxes & be regulated. They have sent delegations to Washington offering exactly that. It's the Nevada gaming lobby that's been funding the politicians to keep a monopoly on their racket.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2014, 03:56 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,009,955 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason3000 View Post
Since you personally would rather go to a brick 'n' mortar casino, you think millions of other Americans should be BANNED from doing something they enjoy? Yeah totalitarianism!
I used to play a lot a few years back..........Toss a couple bucks into a tourney and have a little fun.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2014, 04:00 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,009,955 times
Reputation: 5455
Maybe this is what got em all wound up.........??

"
Wilmington, Del. — Nevada and Delaware leaders signed a landmark agreement Tuesday that will join their states for online poker, potentially increasing payouts for residents who gamble while aiming to model how states might collaborate on an emerging economic opportunity.
The Multi-State Internet Gaming Agreement signed in Wilmington by Gov. Brian Sandoval of Nevada and Gov. Jack Markell of Delaware establishes a legal framework for the first authorized interstate Internet gambling.
The deal aims to expand the marketplace for online poker in the small states that by themselves are not seen as having significant populations for Internet gambling to flourish. Nevada has legalized poker-only online for players logging on within the state, while Delaware has green-lit online slots, blackjack, roulette and poker.
Sandoval described the agreement as a marriage of high tech and gaming, embraced by states seeking growth. He said the day is near when someone in Ely might face a gambler from Seaford, Del., across a virtual poker table, “in a fair game and structured environment.”


Nevada, Delaware signing online poker partnership | Las Vegas Review-Journal
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2014, 04:19 PM
 
5,758 posts, read 11,637,967 times
Reputation: 3870
Quote:
It is immoral........it appears........unless you go to a casino then it is perfectly fine.
Or unless your online betting is on horse races. Sen. Mitch McConnell made sure to get THAT carve-out included, just like Sen. Bill Frist did in the original 2006 ban.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:05 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top