Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-20-2014, 01:18 PM
 
1,730 posts, read 1,362,821 times
Reputation: 760

Advertisements

You damn well better study it, especially you oblamerbots....my money better spent elsewhere, but as long as you're all excited thats all that counts lol


Thanks, Obamacare: myths
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-20-2014, 01:30 PM
 
1,730 posts, read 1,362,821 times
Reputation: 760
How U.S. is lagging on quality of life – Global Public Square - CNN.com Blogs


Is it
a) the fact that the middle class is getting killed trying to support and feed the lame and lazy...or...

a) the fact that the working public is supporting, feeding, educating, and pampering 40% of the US population so the Dems can get their votes?

Dems hate their kids, thats all i can say.
Killing this country to get rich for one generation.
Sad bastards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 03:21 PM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
5,638 posts, read 6,518,058 times
Reputation: 7220
Tell us how you really feel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 03:26 PM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,529,993 times
Reputation: 2052
$500,000,000 on a website? Sorry, I don't believe that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 03:28 PM
 
3,555 posts, read 4,097,013 times
Reputation: 1632
Are we just suppose to take your word for it? Your outrageous claims don't stand up to 30 seconds of scrutiny. Like the fact that the website belongs to ProgressNow, which is a 501(c)(4). Maybe if you took the time to come up with a more intelligent, and more believable, argument, people wouldn't so easily laugh at your every comment. Now, what I want to know is did you make up that claim yourself, or were you duped by some Tea Party Express chain e-mail or some far-right blog hosted by wordpress?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 03:30 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,469,695 times
Reputation: 8599
Thanks, Obamacare
That is a privately owed website. No tax dollars. There is enough real dissent about Obama and the ACA without you making stuff up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 03:34 PM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,529,993 times
Reputation: 2052
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoD Guy View Post
How U.S. is lagging on quality of life – Global Public Square - CNN.com Blogs
a) the fact that the working public is supporting, feeding, educating, and pampering 40% of the US population so the Dems can get their votes?
Democrats are trying to get 40% of the vote? "I like you. You funny guy. I kill you last."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 03:34 PM
 
3,599 posts, read 6,785,206 times
Reputation: 1461
Well according to the CBO report last week. Administrative costs like the Heathcare.gov website and hiring IRS agents do not count against the ACA budget.

It's like it's a free website! It doesn't matter if they spent 500 million on the website! Heck it doesn't matter if they spend 10 billion on hiring IRS agents. It won't be counted as part of the "net costs" of the ACA. Gotta love government accounting.

Read their list of exclusions when calculating the costs. After all we really believe them when they say it only costs 35 billion to administer the ACA for 2014. Yet 20 billion is already being spent on medicaid expansion for 2014. So it's really only going to cost 15 billion for everything else this year?

I guess the Easter bunny does exist after all.

Read page 6 of PDF file from CBO for exclusions.

"These numbers exclude effects on the deficit of provisions of the Affordable Care Act that are not related to insurance coverage. They also exclude federal administrative costs subject to appropriation. (CBO has previously estimated that the Internal Revenue Service would need to spend between $5 billion and $10 billion over the 2010–2019 period to implement the Affordable Care Act and that the Department of Health and Human Services and other federal agencies would also need to spend $5 billion to $10 billion over that period.) In addition, the Affordable Care Act included explicit authorizations for spending on a variety of grant and other programs; that funding is also subject to future appropriation"

http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/fil..._Estimates.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 03:37 PM
 
3,555 posts, read 4,097,013 times
Reputation: 1632
Quote:
Originally Posted by aneftp View Post
Well according to the CBO report last week. Administrative costs like the Heathcare.gov website and hiring IRS agents do not count against the ACA budget.
The OP wasn't referring to healthcare.gov.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 03:38 PM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,529,993 times
Reputation: 2052
Quote:
Originally Posted by aneftp View Post
Well according to the CBO report last week. Administrative costs like the Heathcare.gov website and hiring IRS agents do not count against the ACA budget.

It's like it's a free website! It doesn't matter if they spent 500 million on the website! Heck it doesn't matter if they spend 10 billion on hiring IRS agents. It won't be counted as part of the "net costs" of the ACA. Gotta love government accounting.

Read their list of exclusions when calculating the costs. After all we really believe them when they say it only costs 35 billion to administer the ACA for 2014. Yet 20 billion is already being spent on medicaid expansion for 2014. So it's really only going to cost 15 billion for everything else this year?

I guess the Easter bunny does exist after all.

Read page 6 of PDF file from CBO for exclusions.

"These numbers exclude effects on the deficit of provisions of the Affordable Care Act that are not related to insurance coverage. They also exclude federal administrative costs subject to appropriation. (CBO has previously estimated that the Internal Revenue Service would need to spend between $5 billion and $10 billion over the 2010–2019 period to implement the Affordable Care Act and that the Department of Health and Human Services and other federal agencies would also need to spend $5 billion to $10 billion over that period.) In addition, the Affordable Care Act included explicit authorizations for spending on a variety of grant and other programs; that funding is also subject to future appropriation"

http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/fil..._Estimates.pdf
This may be true, but there is no website on earth that cost five-hundred-million dollars. The OP is full of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:38 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top