Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wonder how Justice Sotomayor would respond if Asian American brought up lawsuit against the Ivy League colleges for artificially keeping their enrollment at around 17%.
She probably would say "tough luck". "You Indians and East Asians don't need any minority help even those you are minorities and still get discriminated against in the real white collar executive world".
Yes or no? That's the way she would respond. See she can't play the race card by selectively giving some minorities an advantage when she would probably rule against affirmative action if an "over represented minority" brought up a lawsuit.
Wonder how Justice Sotomayor would respond if Asian American brought up lawsuit against the Ivy League colleges for artificially keeping their enrollment at around 17%.
She probably would say "tough luck". "You Indians and East Asians don't need any minority help even those you are minorities and still get discriminated against in the real white collar executive world".
Yes or no? That's the way she would respond. See she can't play the race card by selectively giving some minorities an advantage when she would probably rule against affirmative action if an "over represented minority" brought up a lawsuit.
Yeah that's probably the case -- but she can be a hypocrite if she wants though and nothing's stopping her, she's a supreme court justice and pretty much gets to do whatever the heck she wants regardless of the law, politics, or anything really until she dies or retires. The only thing restraining her or any of the other justices are their respect for the rule of law and sense of decency, or lack thereof whichever the case may be.
Do you think white men know and understand everything in their infinite wisdom?
I know I can't claim to speak for white men, or black women. Why do you think the Supreme Court shouldn't speak for, and understand, a huge US demographic?
If you have any doubts about why we need a diverse court, check out the thread "telling women to smile." The white men there just can't get enough of telling women how to act, behave, think and feel. Because, you know, anything that doesn't seem wrong to them, can't possibly be wrong.
Works the same -- only more so -- on a court.
You don't seem to have any sort of legal argument to make, unsurprisingly. And that "telling women to smile" thread was about dudes who make catcalls at women on city streets. If you think it's mostly "white men" who do that, well, I don't know what to tell you.
Oh, I thought you were referring to Justice Thomas. You know, the self-loatihng idiot who hasn't got IQ sufficient to ask a single question during hearings.
Thomas has been the recipient of some "affirmative action," I'm sure. But his look at his dissent in Grutter v. Bollinger, another affirmative action case. It's a masterpiece of legal argument compared to that illogical mess that Sotomayor embarrassed herself with the other day. GRUTTER V. BOLLINGER
So, what kind of action was it that got Scalia and Thomas appointed? In my mind affirmative action is far better than the retarded action that got those two idiots on the court.
Do you think that Latinas know and understand everything in their infinite wisdom?
Since you like a diverse Supreme Court, what do you think of the only black person on the bench?
Would you prefer a white male who decides cases differently?
I don't think he should have been appointed at all. The controversy with Anita Hill should have disqualified him.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.