Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Because you have to prove someone is a threat in order to strip them of their rights..Being mad and screaming at people for no reason is not threatening other people.
No, not at all. Unless of course you are the one that is armed and they start being mad and screaming at you.
i been called n words alot of times in my life or people acted some kind of way towards me so this isnt shocking to me
i'm more shocked that someone would pay to see this raggedy lil bish take her clothes off
people aint even got the sense enough to hide there racism from a camera... in a liberal state like NY that ish isnt gonna go over well. child protective services will probably show up at her house if they see this.
There is if she can prove he did it to intimidate the children and depending on the state.
Nah. Let's see a source. You know better than that. Intimidating changing the nature of an act to a crime? I would think intimidating is a major reason for videoing. People won't do some things when you can make a record. That is intimidation. A perfectly reasonable reason.
1. Why was the guy just "hanging out" video recording people?
2. Why did the guy continue to "prod" the women in an attempt to elicit a response?
3. The woman's behavior seemed exaggerated and contrived.
4. The "black guy" sounded too educated and calculated to persist in "entrapping" and "exposing" some loser hillbilly. Why bother? I have been called worse "RACIST" things by black people and have walked/driven away from a confrontation.
Just another staged "racism" false flag. Tawana Brawley would be proud.
1. Why was the guy just "hanging out" video recording people?
2. Why did the guy continue to "prod" the women in an attempt to elicit a response?
3. The woman's behavior seemed exaggerated and contrived.
4. The "black guy" sounded too educated and calculated to persist in "entrapping" and "exposing" some loser hillbilly. Why bother? I have been called worse "RACIST" things by black people and have walked/driven away from a confrontation.
Just another staged "racism" false flag. Tawana Brawley would be proud.
1) i have an HD camera on my HTC phone
2) i'd do the same thing
3) i see f'd up people like this everyday, alot of em can be found in dollar stores
4) "too educated" well you just showed your cards. the "black" guy youtubes footage showing child abuse
the "black guy" doesnt care about being called a n-- he is interested in catching footage of an ugly olive oyl looking bish with erratic behavior repeatedly using profanity and racial slurs in front of her children at the dollar store. welcome to 2014
Nah. Let's see a source. You know better than that. Intimidating changing the nature of an act to a crime? I would think intimidating is a major reason for videoing. People won't do some things when you can make a record. That is intimidation. A perfectly reasonable reason.
Did you read it? It says what you can do is leave if you do not like the pictures being taken. The law from your cite...
State Statute 13-3019
A. It is unlawful for any person to knowingly photograph, videotape, film, digitally record or by any other means secretly view, with or without a device, another person without that person's consent under either of the following circumstances:
1. In a restroom, bathroom, locker room, bedroom or other location where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy and the person is urinating, defecating, dressing, undressing, nude or involved in sexual intercourse or sexual contact.
2. In a manner that directly or indirectly captures or allows the viewing of the person's genitalia, buttock or female breast, whether clothed or unclothed, that is not otherwise visible to the public.
B. It is unlawful to disclose, display, distribute or publish a photograph, videotape, film or digital recording made in violation of subsection A of this section without the consent or knowledge of the person depicted.
Did you read it? It says what you can do is leave if you do not like the pictures being taken. The law from your cite...
State Statute 13-3019
A. It is unlawful for any person to knowingly photograph, videotape, film, digitally record or by any other means secretly view, with or without a device, another person without that person's consent under either of the following circumstances:
1. In a restroom, bathroom, locker room, bedroom or other location where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy and the person is urinating, defecating, dressing, undressing, nude or involved in sexual intercourse or sexual contact.
2. In a manner that directly or indirectly captures or allows the viewing of the person's genitalia, buttock or female breast, whether clothed or unclothed, that is not otherwise visible to the public.
B. It is unlawful to disclose, display, distribute or publish a photograph, videotape, film or digital recording made in violation of subsection A of this section without the consent or knowledge of the person depicted.
It also says the person taking pictures can NOT cross the line of INTIMIDIDATION.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
the video is disturbing enough
