Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 06-27-2014, 10:57 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by helenejen View Post
You really have no shame, do you. Just going to keep vomiting random pictures in spite of actual facts.

From June 13, 2013:

"The Supreme Court on Thursday issued a new regulation barring most demonstrations on the plaza in front of the courthouse. The regulation did not significantly alter the court’s longstanding restrictions on protests on its plaza. It appeared, rather, to be a reaction to a decision issued Tuesday by a federal judge, which narrowed the applicability of a 1949 federal law barring “processions or assemblages” or the display of “a flag, banner or device designed or adapted to bring into public notice a party, organization or movement” in the Supreme Court building or on its grounds . . .

The regulation issued Thursday, which the court said was “approved by the chief justice of the United States,” requires visitors to “maintain suitable order and decorum within the Supreme Court building and grounds.” It bars demonstrations, which it defines as “picketing, speech making, marching, holding vigils or religious services and all other like forms of conduct that involve the communication or expression of views or grievances, engaged in by one or more persons, the conduct of which is reasonably likely to draw a crowd or onlookers.”

Supreme Court Issues New Rule Barring Protests on Plaza
Is not a picture worth a thousand words? What does your link say? It says they are regulating protest on the grounds of the Supreme Court. One can not protest on the grounds of an abortion clinic either.

They don't want large groups blocking the steps of the building. Read this thread, few if any support people blocking access to a clinic either.

 
Old 06-27-2014, 11:11 AM
 
Location: exit 0
5,342 posts, read 4,429,096 times
Reputation: 7075
Evidently, some of you don't get it. Don't bother to start another one.


CLOSED
__________________
"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country." ~JFK
Terms of Service
Copyright Info
Frequently Asked Questions
Do NOT reply to moderator posts that are in RED.
Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top