Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You really have no shame, do you. Just going to keep vomiting random pictures in spite of actual facts.
From June 13, 2013:
"The Supreme Court on Thursday issued a new regulation barring most demonstrations on the plaza in front of the courthouse. The regulation did not significantly alter the court’s longstanding restrictions on protests on its plaza. It appeared, rather, to be a reaction to a decision issued Tuesday by a federal judge, which narrowed the applicability of a 1949 federal law barring “processions or assemblages” or the display of “a flag, banner or device designed or adapted to bring into public notice a party, organization or movement” in the Supreme Court building or on its grounds . . .
The regulation issued Thursday, which the court said was “approved by the chief justice of the United States,” requires visitors to “maintain suitable order and decorum within the Supreme Court building and grounds.” It bars demonstrations, which it defines as “picketing, speech making, marching, holding vigils or religious services and all other like forms of conduct that involve the communication or expression of views or grievances, engaged in by one or more persons, the conduct of which is reasonably likely to draw a crowd or onlookers.”
Is not a picture worth a thousand words? What does your link say? It says they are regulating protest on the grounds of the Supreme Court. One can not protest on the grounds of an abortion clinic either.
They don't want large groups blocking the steps of the building. Read this thread, few if any support people blocking access to a clinic either.