Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-25-2014, 10:13 AM
 
46,328 posts, read 27,166,761 times
Reputation: 11136

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leisesturm View Post
Another climate change thread started by a Conservative. Really? City Data must have 20,000 Climate Change threads started by Conservatives and 100 started by Liberals. There is Climate Change and man is at least partly responsible. To deny this is to be criminally complicit in the accelerated extinction of humankind. I am not at all surprised that Conservatives have wound up on the deny'er side of the Climate Change imbroglio. When have Conservatives ever wound up championing the humanitarian angle? When? This is not a rhetorical question. Tell me one issue on which the Conservative viewpoint does not favor a rich, well off minority of individuals, even when the particular Conservative espousing those views may not themselves be in that rich, well off minority.

H
Many agree with you on hte underlined part above, however, it's how many on your side spokes people are pusing the idea...that we must act now or you will die a horable death, and oh those darn animals in the woods.....

Have you bought carbon credits latley?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-25-2014, 10:17 AM
 
Location: Where you aren't
1,245 posts, read 924,677 times
Reputation: 520
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretzelogik View Post
One thing about that dern climate....it keeps on a changin'.
I'm hoping the climate will change to winter soon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2014, 10:53 AM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,888,434 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
It is only the liberal AGW scammers who want people to believe their lies that their opponents do not believe the climate changes. Nobody is that stupid. Of course the climate changes. So the next time someone calls another a "climate change denier," you will know who and what they truly are - lying liberal freaks.

There are a lot of different factors that determine the climate. One of them is radiative forcing, which is the difference between the energy that hits the Earth and the amount reflected back into space. The three radiative active "greenhouse" gases that have the biggest effect are water vapor, methane and carbon dioxide. Methane is about 25 times more radiative than carbon dioxide, but there is so little methane in the atmosphere it accounts for less than 1% of the radiative forcing. Carbon dioxide (at 400 ppm) accounts for just under 4%, while water vapor accounts for 96% of the radiative forcing.

It is pure hubris to believe humans, or any species, could have a significant impact on the planet that could effect global climate. Humans may excel at destroying their local environment, but that is as far as our destruction extends.
well said.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post
It is nothing to believe. Anthropogenic climate change is about as strong a theory as can be.
yep, and theories are rubbish because they are NOT proven. which means that theories are in fact WEAK.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leisesturm View Post
Another climate change thread started by a Conservative. Really? City Data must have 20,000 Climate Change threads started by Conservatives and 100 started by Liberals. There is Climate Change and man is at least partly responsible. To deny this is to be criminally complicit in the accelerated extinction of humankind. I am not at all surprised that Conservatives have wound up on the deny'er side of the Climate Change imbroglio. When have Conservatives ever wound up championing the humanitarian angle? When? This is not a rhetorical question. Tell me one issue on which the Conservative viewpoint does not favor a rich, well off minority of individuals, even when the particular Conservative espousing those views may not themselves be in that rich, well off minority.

H
another post from the uneducated alarmist.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
Do you really wish to try to defend that that absurdity?
he will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2014, 10:54 AM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,888,434 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by lookb4youcross View Post
I'm hoping the climate will change to winter soon.
tucson doesnt have a winter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2014, 01:13 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,477,394 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
Humans do affect temperature and atmosphere on a local basis. You see that on the weather reports - the temp is usually a little warmer in the urban populated areas than the suburbs. Pollution is a little worse in the populated areas.

However, there is no large scale human effect on the environment.
Temperatures in the Mat-Su Valley are actually slightly warmer during the summer than Anchorage, and slightly colder during the winter than Anchorage.

As far as air pollution is concerned, that really depends on the geographical location of the city. Denver, Juneau, and Anchorage, for example, have an inversion layer that is caused by mountains being right next door to those cities and that traps air pollution in one spot. There are a lot of cities in a similar predicament. Los Angeles, for example, has the Santa Monica and San Gabriel mountains that traps air pollution and keeps it in one location. Cities that do not have mountains nearby do not have this problem.

All the pollution mankind has ever created has been confined to the troposphere (the first 6 to 8 miles of atmosphere) where it is washed out of the atmosphere in a matter of weeks. In order to have a global effect it must reach the stratosphere, which begins 6 to 8 miles up and goes up another 23 to 25 miles. All climate occurs within either the troposphere or stratosphere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2014, 01:21 PM
 
Location: New York City
792 posts, read 635,956 times
Reputation: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
well said.



yep, and theories are rubbish because they are NOT proven. which means that theories are in fact WEAK.



another post from the uneducated alarmist.



he will.
I'm no uneducated alarmist; I went to college for 4 years and then got an MBA, but the MBA doesn't have anything to do with this.

Between scientists, there is no debate. Humans cause climate change, 99.999% of climate scientists will tell you that.

The only debate is manufactured by "experts" that the big oil and fossil fuel companies have on the payroll. It's just like the cigarette "debate".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2014, 01:26 PM
 
Location: 18011
85 posts, read 103,929 times
Reputation: 113
"I'm no uneducated alarmist; I went to college for 4 years and then got an MBA, but the MBA doesn't have anything to do with this.

Between scientists, there is no debate. Humans cause climate change, 99.999% of climate scientists will tell you that.

The only debate is manufactured by "experts" that the big oil and fossil fuel companies have on the payroll. It's just like the cigarette "debate". "

Today 03:13 PM



99.999% of all climate scientists? Supporting documentation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2014, 01:27 PM
 
Location: New York City
792 posts, read 635,956 times
Reputation: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by valley slacker View Post
"I'm no uneducated alarmist; I went to college for 4 years and then got an MBA, but the MBA doesn't have anything to do with this.

Between scientists, there is no debate. Humans cause climate change, 99.999% of climate scientists will tell you that.

The only debate is manufactured by "experts" that the big oil and fossil fuel companies have on the payroll. It's just like the cigarette "debate". "

Today 03:13 PM



99.999% of all climate scientists? Supporting documentation?
Sorry, just 97%.

Climate Change: Consensus

"Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities,1and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2014, 01:33 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,249,633 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Anthropogenic climate change is about as strong a theory as can be.
That's right.......................theory. Bad theory but theory nevertheless.

I deal in facts. And the fact is humans have no bearing on whether the earth cools or heats which it does on its own periodically.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2014, 01:35 PM
 
Location: New York City
792 posts, read 635,956 times
Reputation: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
That's right.......................theory. Bad theory but theory nevertheless.

I deal in facts. And the fact is humans have no bearing on whether the earth cools or heats which it does on its own periodically.
See, this is part of the problem. A theory is not an educated guess. A theory is an explanation for a particular phenomenon, based on facts and data. The data shows, carbon emissions coincide with increased climate change and unusual weather trends.

I'm guessing you don't believe in evolution either?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top